Search for: "State v. Maker"
Results 721 - 740
of 4,661
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2011, 6:21 pm
In August 2010, I reported on a hotly contested case between Mattel (maker of Barbie dolls) and MGA Entertainment (maker of Bratz dolls) involving ownership rights in the Bratz line of dolls. [read post]
28 May 2011, 10:04 am
” This principle was then fleshed out in Prebble v Television New Zealand Ltd [1995] 1 AC 321 : …the courts and Parliament are both astute to recognise their respective constitutional roles. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
In Baker v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:01 pm
A colleague recently drew my attention to the proposition that "in the United States, the specter of class-action lawsuits imposes a higher level of precaution on the part of drug makers. [read post]
22 May 2009, 4:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 11:16 pm
The motion proposes an evidentiary hearing over this issue.This is only the latest example of United States et al. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:44 pm
Thomas v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 2:01 pm
He refers to the decisions in Anderson v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
SEC; NASDAQ Stock Market LLC v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:57 am
In this respect, adjudication differs from voting, which allows a decision-maker to decide without having to articulate her reasons (or even without having any reasons). [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 6:41 am
Moss is among a panel of patent experts testifying today before the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property about the state of patent eligibility in America.The Supreme Court ruled in Alice v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 7:37 am
Jordan v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:24 pm
This court has stated that test above. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 6:54 am
The court’s ruling differs from other recent rulings in lawsuits against the makers of Foster’s (Nelson v. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 12:24 pm
So the Texas Court of Appeals held yesterday, in State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 6:38 am
Like lower courts, the Supreme Court ruled that the federal Medical Device Amendments of 1976 specifically preclude states from imposing their own requirements on the makers of federally regulated medical devices [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 6:18 am
Lord Wilson observed that, where it is necessary to attribute a human state of mind to a company, it is necessary to determine which persons’ mental processes will count as those of the company. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:30 am
[This is the second installment in a three-part series on the Guest-Post: States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration: AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 5:04 am
Miller v. [read post]
