Search for: "State v. NICHOLAS S." Results 721 - 740 of 1,336
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2015, 10:00 am
Tom Vilsack, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am by Amy Howe
  And Mayer Brown’s Class Defense Blog covers yesterday’s grant in DirecTV v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:18 am by Amy Howe
Wednesday’s oral arguments in King v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:15 pm by Guest Blogger
The federalism argument has been made in two important Supreme Court amicus curiae briefs, one submitted on behalf of 22 states and the District of Columbia, and another on behalf of four law professors – Abbe Gluck, Gillian Metzger, Thomas Merrill, and Nicholas Bagley.The federalism argument is based on the doctrine of Pennhurst State Hospital v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:27 am
 Yale’s Abbe Gluck, writing in Politico last week, invoked Gregory v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:13 am by Amy Howe
Next week’s oral arguments in King v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:17 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Nicholas Stephanopoulos looks at the effect that the Court’s decision in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:16 pm by LTA-Editor
By Nicholas Ulrich The recent outbreak of measles in some states has caused many to question our present vaccination polices. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 5:01 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Supreme Court denied Alabama’s request to stay a federal judge’s ruling striking down the states ban on same-sex marriage. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:41 am by Amy Howe
Coverage and commentary continue to focus on King v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 10:35 am by Guest Blogger
Timothy Jost On January 28, 2015, thirty amicus briefs were filed in the Supreme Court supporting the validity of the Internal Revenue Service rule in King v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am by Amy Howe
At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley weighs in on King v. [read post]