Search for: "State v. Perry"
Results 721 - 740
of 2,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2012, 9:25 am
This new ruling, in addition to the Ninth Circuit's decision in Perry v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am
Perry, the case involving a challenge to California’s Proposition 8 banning gay marriage, or United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 6:53 am
Summary of Decision issued August 21, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Johnson v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:19 pm
On AT&T v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am
Perry & Ors v Serious Organised Crime Agency and Perry & Ors (No. 2) v Serious Organised Crime Agency, heard 20 – 23 March 2012. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 4:27 pm
The state under its current governor, Rick Perry (pictured), leads the way in killing people, far outpacing other death penalty states. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 1:44 am
Supreme Court rejected Ghita's claim that the arbitrator exceeded his authority under Education Law § 3020-a, and the award terminating petitioner's employment is a violation of public policy and New York State Law.Perry v Comm. of Labor, App. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 6:40 pm
See Pardo v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 4:32 am
In The Auchter Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
Perry Equipment Corp. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:33 am
Perry, JudgeRepresenting Appellant: P. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 2:27 pm
Perry, Judge Representing Appellant (Plaintiff/Defendant): Diane Lozano, State Public Defender, PDP; Tina N. [read post]
28 May 2009, 12:10 am
The complaint (full text) in Perry v. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 4:39 pm
Chatterjee v CBS, 6:19-CV-212-REW United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:41 am
City of Roanoke Redevelopment & Housing Auth., 479 U.S. 418, 423 (1987); Perry v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:00 am
"Finally, opined the Appellate Division, Petitioners' membership reclassification did not violate Article V, §7 of the New York State Constitution which, in pertinent part, provides that "After July first, nineteen hundred forty, membership in any pension or retirement system of the state or of a civil division thereof shall be a contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired", since "petitioners were never… [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:00 am
"Finally, opined the Appellate Division, Petitioners' membership reclassification did not violate Article V, §7 of the New York State Constitution which, in pertinent part, provides that "After July first, nineteen hundred forty, membership in any pension or retirement system of the state or of a civil division thereof shall be a contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired", since "petitioners were never… [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:00 am
"Finally, opined the Appellate Division, Petitioners' membership reclassification did not violate Article V, §7 of the New York State Constitution which, in pertinent part, provides that "After July first, nineteen hundred forty, membership in any pension or retirement system of the state or of a civil division thereof shall be a contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired", since "petitioners were never… [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:00 am
"Finally, opined the Appellate Division, Petitioners' membership reclassification did not violate Article V, §7 of the New York State Constitution which, in pertinent part, provides that "After July first, nineteen hundred forty, membership in any pension or retirement system of the state or of a civil division thereof shall be a contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired", since "petitioners were never… [read post]