Search for: "State v. Perry" Results 721 - 740 of 2,367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2012, 9:25 am by pfurey
This new ruling, in addition to the Ninth Circuit's decision in Perry v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Perry, the case involving a challenge to California’s Proposition 8 banning gay marriage, or United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 6:53 am
Summary of Decision issued August 21, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Johnson v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Perry & Ors v Serious Organised Crime Agency and Perry & Ors (No. 2) v Serious Organised Crime Agency, heard 20 – 23 March 2012. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 4:27 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
The state under its current governor, Rick Perry (pictured), leads the way in killing people, far outpacing other death penalty states. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 1:44 am
Supreme Court rejected Ghita's claim that the arbitrator exceeded his authority under Education Law § 3020-a, and the award terminating petitioner's employment is a violation of public policy and New York State Law.Perry v Comm. of Labor, App. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am by Marty Lederman
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:33 am by WSLL
Perry, JudgeRepresenting Appellant: P. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 2:27 pm by WSLL
Perry, Judge Representing Appellant (Plaintiff/Defendant): Diane Lozano, State Public Defender, PDP; Tina N. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Chatterjee v CBS, 6:19-CV-212-REW United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Finally, opined the Appellate Division, Petitioners' membership reclassification did not violate Article V, §7 of the New York State Constitution which, in pertinent part, provides that "After July first, nineteen hundred forty, membership in any pension or retirement system of the state or of a civil division thereof shall be a contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired", since "petitioners were never… [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Finally, opined the Appellate Division, Petitioners' membership reclassification did not violate Article V, §7 of the New York State Constitution which, in pertinent part, provides that "After July first, nineteen hundred forty, membership in any pension or retirement system of the state or of a civil division thereof shall be a contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired", since "petitioners were never… [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Finally, opined the Appellate Division, Petitioners' membership reclassification did not violate Article V, §7 of the New York State Constitution which, in pertinent part, provides that "After July first, nineteen hundred forty, membership in any pension or retirement system of the state or of a civil division thereof shall be a contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired", since "petitioners were never… [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Finally, opined the Appellate Division, Petitioners' membership reclassification did not violate Article V, §7 of the New York State Constitution which, in pertinent part, provides that "After July first, nineteen hundred forty, membership in any pension or retirement system of the state or of a civil division thereof shall be a contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired", since "petitioners were never… [read post]