Search for: "State v. Perry" Results 721 - 740 of 2,361
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2014, 2:42 am by Amy Howe
Over the weekend MSNBC’s Melissa Harris-Perry discussed the Alabama redistricting cases and King v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 10:51 pm
Perry so he wouldn’t appear anti-religious when he later voted against the city council prayer in Town of Greece v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 1:46 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
(mem. op., internal citations omitted); see In re Gulf Exploration, LLC, 289 S.W.3d 836, 839-41 (Tex. 2009) (quoting Perry Homes v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 1:46 pm by MOTP
(mem. op., internal citations omitted); see In re Gulf Exploration, LLC, 289 S.W.3d 836, 839-41 (Tex. 2009) (quoting Perry Homes v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 6:41 am by hlpronline
If such an order were issued, Texas would become the first state to be subject to preclearance in the post-Shelby County v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:41 am by Steven Calabresi
Perry and with Justice Scalia’s dissent in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm by John Neiman
His dissent ten years later in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 4:28 pm by Legal Talk Network
Thomas Girardi is an inductee at The Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame who's commonly known for his work in Anderson v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
With this, and attacking the book for its failure to address Roe v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:44 am by Guest Blogger
  Lest we forget, traditional rational basis review was the standard applied in Plessy v. [read post]
—PART V— Not all Native Advertising May Be Commercial Speech under the First Amendment If there is one thing clear from the case law, it is that the commercial speech analysis under the First Amendment is a fact intensive one that does not clearly lend itself to bright lines, especially when dealing with mixed commercial and noncommercial speech. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 7:20 am
Perry, which effectively overturned the Proposition 8 constitutional ban on same-sex marriage that a majority of voters had adopted to counter the 2008 state Supreme Court In re Marriage Cases decision (finding that statutes limiting marriage to opposite-sex people violated the State Constitution). [read post]