Search for: "State v. Pounds" Results 721 - 740 of 3,055
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2009, 3:39 pm
Ryan v London Borough of Islington [2009] EWCA Civ 578 concerned Ms Ryan’s Right to Buy under Part V Housing Act 1985 and whether or not it had been deemed to be withdrawn. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 11:43 pm by INFORRM
Glenn Mulcaire v News Group Newspapers The facts Mr Mulcaire was employed by NGN as a private investigator between 2002 and 2007. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Monroe was awarded £24,000 in a judgment handed down by Warby J in March 2017. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
The Times has paid £30,000 in damages and apologised after suggesting an advocacy organisation was acting as an apologist for a suspected terror attacker. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 9:28 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has issued its eagerly awaited ruling in Ehrenfeld v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:11 am by SHG
Reading the Second Circuit’s affirmance of District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin’s suppression ruling in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 10:39 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    More than any other development in 2012, the decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 12:33 pm
The grant-funded California Restraint Safety Education and Training (CARSEAT) V campaign is aimed at improving child passenger safety throughout the state. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am by Rosalind English
The Queen on the application of Naik v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1546 – read judgment The Court of Appeal has confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker  from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful,  and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:36 pm
In Citicorp v Castex an interpretation clause in the agreement stated "Headings shall be ignored in construing this Trust Deed. [read post]
  The claims arose from the Appellants’ alleged participation with Bilta’s directors and others in a VAT fraud involving carbon credit trading which left Bilta unable to pay debts of over £38m to HMRC. [read post]