Search for: "State v. Simmons"
Results 721 - 740
of 797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2009, 8:55 pm
Simmons, which struck down the death penalty for crimes committed by 16- and 17-year-olds. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 7:15 am
See, e.g., Cord v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am
ACSblog highlights a recent American Constitution Society issue brief on state laws that bar people with criminal records from voting, in light of the Court’s recent call for the views of the Solicitor General in Simmons v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
" State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
" State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:05 pm
The last gasp was an effort to stop the federal lawsuit because there was a parallel state court action based entirely on state law principles. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 1:20 pm
Simmons. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
The decision of the United States District Court forthe Middle District of Alabama in McNair v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
ROBERT SCOTT, HONORABLECOMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS, THORNTON KEEL, DONNA KEEL, MICHAEL HELLRUNG, DONNA HELLRUNG, WILLIAM PASCHALL, DAVID WOMACK, NATALIE KLOSS, DARRYL HUBBELL AND AMY HUBBELL; from Travis County; 3rd district (03-07-00576-CV, 275 SW3d 558, 11-14-08, pet. denied Sep. 2009)09-0138CITY OF AUSTIN, ET AL. v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
The notice also states that taking unfair advantage of an opposing party (e.g., capitalising on a party’s lack of legal knowledge or representation), applying undue pressure or oppressive tactics, or preventing a party from keeping a copy of the NDA, would be a breach of a solicitor’s regulatory obligations. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 8:24 am
Simmons, 15 So. 2d 289, 290 (Fla. 1943). [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 5:39 pm
” Simmons v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
”[15] The purpose of a restatement is to clarify “the underlying principles of the common law” that have “become obscured by the ever-growing mass of decisions in the many different jurisdictions, state and federal, within the United States. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:00 am
In Girao v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:31 am
See, Simmons v. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 8:30 am
“[F]raud will not be presumed in this State and must be proved by clear and convincing evidence” Hofmann v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:12 pm
Simmons, the judicial activists on the left were not bothered by the contrary precedent in Stanford v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm
The system was attacked as a violation of the separation of church and state in Zelman v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 3:27 am
One was the United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 1:30 pm
Read-the-whole-case rating: 3.R. v. [read post]
