Search for: "State v. Simmons"
Results 721 - 740
of 853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2009, 11:30 pm
To do so would be no more violative of precedent that the state court decision affirmed in Roper v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:24 am
Virginia, 2002) and juvenile defendants (Roper v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 9:01 pm
Consider that in Zelman v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 6:28 am
“Officially, the subjective prong is still viable” in determining if a search was consensual, noted Ric Simmons, but after [the Supreme Court's opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 12:04 pm
But state success rates vary widely. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:37 pm
See, e.g., Simmons v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:14 am
Florida (08-7412) and Sullivan v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:24 pm
In case you were wondering, they were Margot Fröhlinger, Director, DG Internal Market and Services, European Commission, Brussels Dr Klaus Grabinski, Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) Karlsruhe Professor Sir Robin Jacob, University College London Marcin Korolec, Undersecretary of State, Ministry of Economy, Warsaw Eurico Marques dos Reis, Judge of the Court of Appeal, Lisbon Kevin Mooney, Partner and Head of Intellectual Property, Simmons &… [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 8:38 am
Queen (1974), 56 Ill.2d 560, 564, 310 N.E.2d 166 “[W]hen an objection is made, specific grounds must be stated and other grounds not stated are waived on review” Jones v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 2:15 pm
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT'---~F;:U'l";;ED;::---U.S. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 7:14 am
Florida (08-7412) and Sullivan v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 7:13 am
Hobbs; Miller v. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
The Court stated that the operators of said platform, playing an essential role in making the works available, are to be considered liable of copyright infringement. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 2:23 am
The Court stated that the operators of said platform, playing an essential role in making the works available, are to be considered liable of copyright infringement. [read post]
Samsung presents legal argument against 'manifest injustice' that would result from Apple's proposal
17 Sep 2015, 6:51 am
" (emphasis added) The Federal Circuit said so in its mid-2013 Fresenius decision and based this holding on "[t]he Supreme Court's decision in Simmons Co. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 3:00 am
Simmons, Kennedy v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am
Standard International Management v EUIPO Case T-768/20 EU General Court (July 2022)Can a hotel in the United States use an EU trade mark? [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:35 am
City of Panora v. [read post]
Chemerinsky opina sobre consecuencias de nombramiento de Brett Kavanaugh al Tribunal Supremo federal
3 Sep 2018, 7:25 am
Texas (2003), United States v. [read post]
