Search for: "State v. Small"
Results 721 - 740
of 15,199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:39 pm
Last week, the petitioners filed their merits brief in Sackett v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 7:25 am
United States, decided in 1926, and Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:20 pm
The following is a reprint of a client advisory from last summer:On June 25, 2008, the United States Supreme Court in Exxon Shipping Company v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 3:08 pm
Daly (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)United States, Osage Minerals Council v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:35 am
In West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 8:21 am
Bradley Basu v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
In Maine, small school districts that do not operate their own high schools or contract with a specific school for educational purposes, pay tuition for residents to attend a high school elsewhere in the state. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:46 am
As a result of this promise the son had lived and worked on his family’s farm for over 25 years, only earning a very small wage. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 10:25 am
Her organization, NFIB, was involved in litigation against the Affordable Care Act, in NFIB v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
§1257 under Michigan v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 8:28 pm
In Rock Church, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 7:48 am
See Samaniego v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 9:46 am
Doe v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 10:12 am
Bank v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:05 pm
The Case of Navarette v. [read post]
