Search for: "State v. Strickland"
Results 721 - 740
of 913
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2015, 6:44 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
DiazDocket: 10-1264Issue(s): (1) Whether it is necessarily unreasonable under Strickland v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
United States 14-1145Issue: Whether, under Holland v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
The state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:28 am
State, 1 Ga. 243 (1846), reaffirmed, Strickland v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 12:44 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:39 am
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:00 am
Let’s dispense with Missouri v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am
Strickland in holding that those districts were not narrowly tailored to the compelling governmental interest of compliance with the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 3:25 am
Whether you’re good with lack of preservation arguments, or the exceptionally low bar of Strickland v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 11:43 am
Still, the odd facts of Weaver v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 1:55 pm
State, 2010 Fla. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:42 am
"The case is Elfgeeh v. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 4:22 am
Those cases, the Supreme Court declared (in State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Maryland and that this failure prejudiced the defense; and (2) whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that petitioner’s sole attorney provided ineffective representation at the guilt phase of trial under Strickland v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am
Texas, 18-9674Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:53 am
Vance Spath called to order the military commission in the case of United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm
Short-form indictments for statutory sex offense and indecent liberties using identical language for each charge and joined for trial were not defective State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:48 am
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 12:42 pm
” Strickland v. [read post]