Search for: "State v. Su" Results 721 - 740 of 30,049
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
On 14 February 2024 there was a strike out/summary judgment application in the case of Chowdhury-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department KB-2023-003368. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The court doesn’t insist that the board members should have stated they were not independent. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 9:21 am by Tobin Admin
Because she sued to recover for personal injuries, the statute of limitations for her negligence claim expired on September 8, 2022—two years from the date of the accident. [read post]
By: Sofia Ellington On January 18th, 2024, The Washington Supreme Court came to the University of Washington School of Law to hear oral arguments in the case of Greenberg, et al. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:12 pm by centerforartlaw
Therefore, it expired on February 3, 2009, long before the plaintiffs brought the action in New York state court in December 2022. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
He told Freund he was afraid he’d be sued by heirs of Confederate lawyers and judges, not a worry that haunts most historians. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:40 am by Matthias Weller
More precisely Article 7 (2) of the Brussels Ia Regulation had to be interpreted, according to which a person domiciled in a Member State may be sued in another Member State, ‘in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict, in the courts for the place where the harmful event occurred or may occur’. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:16 am by Chukwuma Okoli
Ratification by more states in which a talaq is a legally effective form of divorce and by more European states would provide the much-needed security for families moving from Islamic states to Europe. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]