Search for: "State v. Warner" Results 721 - 740 of 1,296
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2012, 4:20 pm
Plessy v Ferguson in 1896 held that despite the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, a state law requiring separate railroad cars for blacks and whites was constitutional as long as the cars were physically the same. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 2:07 pm by John J. Sullivan
Warner-Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85, 94 (2d Cir. 2006)). [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:37 am by Colter Paulson
  The Supreme Court accepted cert in Desinao, but issued only a 4-4 split decision in Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:43 pm by Bexis
Warner Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2006), aff’d by equally divided court, 552 U.S. 440 (2008), attempting to distinguish Buckman Co. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Major film studios — including Disney, 20th Century Fox, Universal City, Columbia Pictures, and Warner Bros. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Major film studios — including Disney, 20th Century Fox, Universal City, Columbia Pictures, and Warner Bros. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 1:57 am
The case is Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Ltd and another company v Warner-Lambert Company LLC [2012] EWHC 1719 (Ch), a Patents Court, England and Wales, decision of Mr Justice Roth of 28 June in relation to a dispute which arose over atorvastatin, a popular pharma product distributed in the UK by Pfizer (Warner Lambert being part of the Pfizer group of companies: the defendant was referred to as 'Pfizer' throughout the proceedings). [read post]