Search for: "State v. Words"
Results 721 - 740
of 36,203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2014, 11:16 am
See Michaels v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:55 am
” Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 12:44 pm
At the bottom of page 326 in this opinion today, Judge Betty Fletcher uses "sur-reply" when describing the response of the United States to the reply brief of the defendant. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 1:53 pm
(People v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 12:00 pm
A word of warning: the Order is long. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:14 pm
The petition asks the Court to extend the Sixth Amendment's unanimous jury requirement to the states and to overrule Apodaca v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 5:55 pm
My thought is that it will look much like United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:37 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:25 am
In People v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:00 pm
P. 56(c); Celotex Corp. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
In other words, the focus of the analysis is usually the question of proportionality. [read post]
5 May 2012, 12:17 pm
(13) In other words, the Supreme Court may not have seen the last of Monroe Setser. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:47 pm
Nikita Cloyd v. [read post]
22 May 2010, 5:38 am
Consider, for example, how heavily today’s decision rested on the analysis in the Supreme Court’s 1950 decision in Johnson v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 3:20 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 3:54 pm
In other words, the Court is taking up the question whether Harris v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
I'll say a few more words about the case as well as state sovereign immunity more broadly.The Constitution contains no express provision granting state governments sovereign immunity. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 6:48 pm
Three weeks ago, CAAF granted review in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 pm
Chief Justice Roberts' opinion notes that ordinarily the Supreme Court defers to state supreme courts as having the last word on questions involving the meaning of state law as was held in Murdock v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
There is no problem with the aim pursed by the measure at stake, i.e. the imposition of liability, as in the words of the ECtHR protecting the rights of others is a legitimate aim. [read post]
