Search for: "Stillings v. Davis"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,946
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2009, 1:49 pm
Lee], Gagne [v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 6:47 pm
, 1960 CanLII 37 (SCC), [1960] S.C.R. 361, per Judson J., at p. 368, quoting Davis Contractors Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:19 pm
” Read the whole case, Davis v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm
That is, even as Republicans have largely won their decades-long war against labor unions in the private sector (allowing most private companies to quickly drop their pension plans), the public sector is the one remaining stronghold of workers’ power.This issue arose in 2018’s Janus v. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 11:41 pm
Case in point is the Second Circuit’s 2001 opinion in On Davis v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:00 am
Randolph, 531 U.S. 79, 83, 121 S.Ct. 513, 148 L.Ed.2d 373 (2000); Davis v. [read post]
18 Dec 2021, 1:49 pm
Davis, 205 Ill. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 1:09 pm
Hilton Davis (patent law doctrine of equivalents), and Two Pesos v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 9:41 am
The Dutch Court clearly distinguished its judgment from the UK decision and the distinction was justified by new experimental evidence as well as expert evidence provided by Tiefenbacher, In the UK case, Kitchin J heavily relied on the interpretation by Prof Davies, Head of Chemistry at Oxford University, of certain organic chemistry rules called the "Baldwin Rules", which were created by Davies' predecessor at Oxford, Prof. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:01 pm
If an encampment of anti-abortion protestors were configured in a way that made it unreasonably difficult or impossible for patients, visitors, or medical staff of an abortion clinic to get inside the building where and when they needed to in order to receive or provide the appropriate medical procedures, no one would deny the clinic’s mission had been seriously and irreparably harmed.Some encampments may not completely obstruct access to buildings but may still cause serious… [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
In any event, McShane could have declined to discuss the trial but still commented on issues relating to the sentence. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
We recognize that even if one moves away from this contention of equivalence, one still might believe that conception is important in that it creates a fetus which has immediate and increasing moral value. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:00 pm
In Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:30 am
(No argument was made about the 911 calls themselves, since they were clearly non-testimonial under the “emergency” doctrine of Davis v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 8:55 pm
Davis (2019). [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:48 pm
Davis, Civ. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:30 am
This post was co-authored by Jennifer Davis and Shannon Herlihy, Law Library Creative Intern. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
