Search for: "Sweet v. Sweet" Results 721 - 740 of 1,646
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2014, 3:04 am by Peter Mahler
A Manhattan appellate panel’s decision last month in Akasa Holdings, LLC v Sweet, 2014 NY Slip Op 01822 [1st Dept Mar. 20, 2014], illustrates another kind of co-op shareholder dispute involving a battle for board control of a four-unit co-op, pitting one tenant-shareholder owning a majority of the voting shares against the other three tenant-shareholders. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
The district court’s express preemption ruling in Simoneau v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 1:04 pm by Elim
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KD530 .P83 v. 128James Oldham, ed., Case Notes of Sir Soulden Lawrence 1787-1800 (London: Selden Society, 2013). [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 7:21 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
It goes down from there: by the team you reach the Sweet Sixteen, the favorites only win 61% of the time. 4. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 5:40 am
  The Marcus order is short and sweet, but it sure grabbed our attention. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp & Others, a Chancery Division, England and Wales, ruling last week from Mr Justice Nugee [don't ask: the Kats haven't come across him either, but he is a Chancery judge], addressed an important preliminary issue. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:40 am
(iii) Duplication of the trial judge's role on appeal is a disproportionate use of the limited resources of an appellate court, and will seldom lead to a different outcome in an individual case [but it does happen: Lumos Skincare v Sweet Squared, noted here by the IPKat, happened less than a year ago. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
. ____ Q: What is the name of the wood pavement patentee in City of Elizabeth v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm by Francisco Macías
Although there is some discrepancy about who made it sweet, many sources attribute this to a recommendation made by Hernán Cortés to his sovereign, Charles V, the Holy Roman Emperor. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:04 am
’Following a short and sweet [for Rolex and, by implication, IP rights owners of all shapes and sizes] analysis consisting of just 13 paragraphs, the CJEU ruled as follows:Council Regulation ... 1383/2003 ... [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:12 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
  George Harrison, for example, was found to have infringed the copyright in the song “He’s So Fine” when he wrote “My Sweet Lord,” even though the court acknowledged that it was probably a case of unconscious borrowing (see Bright Tunes Music v. [read post]