Search for: "T "
Results 721 - 740
of 880,952
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2013, 6:01 pm
There is an interesting final remark on the composition of the Examining Division (ED).[3] It is established jurisprudence of the Boards of Appeal that for a decision to be reasoned it must contain a logical sequence of arguments and that all facts, evidence and arguments essential to the decision must be discussed in detail (see for instance T 278/00 [2-4]; T 1997/08 [4]).[4] The Boards of Appeal have consistently decided further that a request for a decision based on the current… [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
The first two conditions of R 76(2)(c) are therefore clearly fulfilled.[1.4] With respect to the last condition (facts and evidence), according to the established case law the notice of opposition must indicate the “when”, “what” and under “what circumstances”, in particular “to whom”, the alleged public prior use was made available (T 522/94 [headnote IV, 10, 12, 20 to 25]; T 328/87 [3.3]).[1.5] In the present case, the [opponent]… [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 9:19 am
The post Declining Testosterone Levels Does Not Always Mean You Need Low-T Treatment appeared first on . [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 11:01 am
T 506/91 and T 54/00. [1.2] The decision in T 386/04 referred to by the patent proprietor is not relevant since in that case the proprietor’s main request had been refused by the OD so that the proprietor was indisputably prejudiced by the decision; the question in the appeal was the admissibility of its main request, not the admissibility of its appeal. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 1:05 am
Wassup, T-Mo? [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 10:18 am
You Were Partially Responsible for Causing the Accident So You Can’t Recover Compensation While there are a few states where you’ll be barred from pursuing compensation if you contributed to causing the truck accident, California isn’t part of this group. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 12:00 am
“Sir, as much as I love your city, I really don’t want to be here on the sixth,” Woodward declares. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
They clearly do not figure in the plating solution of D1. [2.5.2] Although the definition “comprising” of claim 1 does not exclude such additional components the present application is absolutely silent with respect to an optional addition of such a chelating agent like HEDTA, or of surfactants such as said Chemeen T-15 or Igepal Co-730 (compare point 2.3.1 above), let alone that such components should be added in such considerable amounts. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 2:19 pm
But imagine if AT&T also rejected Apple’s idea? [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
This is also true where an error would not have led to a different outcome of the proceedings (see in particular T 144/94 [4]; T 12/03 [4.5]; T 17/97 [8.2]).[1.7] As to the request for remittal to the first instance, under the provisions of Article 11 RPBA the board must remit the case to the department of first instance if fundamental deficiencies are apparent, unless special reasons present themselves for doing otherwise.In the present case, considering that the… [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm
T 382/92). [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
Reasoning as in T 708/00, an objection under R 137(5) should not have been made. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
T 986/93 [2.4] and T 620/08 [3.4]). [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 9:26 pm
T-Mobile had moved to dismiss claim 109 of U.S. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 9:18 pm
John T. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 8:55 am
Das BVerwGer bestätigt einen Entscheid des IGE. wonach die Marke "T-CITY" wegen gestützt auf die Widerspruchsmarke LA CITY zu löschen sei. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:00 pm
Since this warrant failed to satisfy that standard, the Queens County Supreme Court granted the defendants’ suppression and dismissal request.On appeal, the Appellate Division, Second Department, also had some issues with the underlying paperwork, which described the “Subject Location,” as “`a two-story, two-family home,’ with a ‘right main entrance’ and a ‘left main entrance,’ in which ‘[t]he right entrance opens up to a living… [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 11:00 pm
THIS WASN’T PRESTIGIOUS, AT ALLAfter a nonpayment case was started against it, Prestige Catering filed a motion to dismiss alleging, among other things, that its "landlord," Chickery, lacked standing to maintain a summary proceeding and didn’t have the authority to sublease the space.After its motion was denied, its answer was rejected as “untimely,” and a judgment in the amount of $91,656.45 was entered against it by the Queens County Civil Court,… [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 10:00 pm
’s case should have been dismissed and the spoliation request denied, as academic.That certainly didn’t work.# # #DECISIONM.V. v Sunstone Red Oak, LLC [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 12:22 pm
Lundgren and Adam T. [read post]
