Search for: "THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 721 - 740
of 35,726
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 2:14 pm
Between May 2022 when the Supreme Court accidentally leaked the draft memo and the following June when the case was decided, there was a mad scramble to figure out what the impacts would be. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 12:32 pm
Similarly, the Supreme Court ruled just a few years ago that California had to compensate employers after it forced them to let union representatives access their property. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 12:13 pm
"To date, neither the Supreme Court nor any of our sister circuits have addressed whether the compelled use of a biometric to unlock an electronic device is testimonial. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 8:49 am
Supreme Court decision updated the federal religious accommodation test in Groff v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:31 am
Code, § 5909 based upon Supreme Court holdings that a summary denial of a petition for reconsideration is inconsistent with Lab. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:36 am
The recent ruling by the California Supreme Court in Estrada v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
A year ago, almost to the day, my (co-authored) Verdict column focused on the lessons to be learned from a high-profile and boisterous protest by Stanford Law School students at a Federalist Society Speaker Event featuring Judge Kyle Duncan, a conservative Trump-appointed judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:26 pm
THE ISSUE THE SUPREME COURT IS TAKING UP TODAY? [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:58 pm
Supreme Court decisions in Nollan v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
For L&E-specific podcasts, see: The Metaverse and L&E Podcast (Tim Taylor) Recent Supreme Court Rulings Impacting Labor & Employment Podcast (Tim Taylor) The Court Closes with LGBTQ Rights and Biden Debt Plan Podcast (Law 360) The Supreme Court Guts Affirmative Action Podcast (Law 360) Want the Sabbath Off? [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution vests in Congress the authority to "constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:21 am
California, a Supreme Court case from 1962, a majority of justices invalidated a California law that made drug addiction illegal, even when someone had not engaged in any illegal conduct involving drugs. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Supreme Court unanimously overruled more than two decades of California precedent, holding that legislatively established development impact fee programs must have an essential nexus and a rough proportionality to the impacts from the proposed development project on which they are being applied. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:55 am
In February 2024, the Supreme Court of Appeal, in Lindsey v Conteh, considered the enforceability of foreign judgments in South Africa. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:55 am
DOMESTIC DEVELOPMENTS The Supreme Court will hear oral argu [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
The post Today in Supreme Court History: April 15, 1931 appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 11:04 pm
In yet another “regulatory takings” case from California, the Supreme Court wound up not answering that precise question. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
This is in sharp contrast to the Supreme Court’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 1:10 pm
However, the Court chose not to deal with that question, which will now be remanded back to the California state courts for their consideration. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court (1998): For a federal prisoner to obtain Section 2255 review of a procedurally defaulted claim following a plea deal, the prisoner must prove his "actual innocence" not just of his crime of conviction, but of any more serious charges in the indictment that the government dismissed as part of the plea deal. [read post]
