Search for: "TURNER v. STATE" Results 721 - 740 of 1,322
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am by INFORRM
On 25 April 2013, there was a Pre Trial Review in the case of Small v Turner. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 11:37 am by Gritsforbreakfast
This would create in state habeas law a remedy for lawyers' failure to advised their clients of collateral consequences, following a recent SCOTUS precedent on-point in Padilla v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:39 am by Terry Hart
The Second Circuit’s 2008 decision in Cartoon Network v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
Neil Turner v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Metro, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Bath & North East Somerset Council v The Times, Clause 5, 11/04/2013; Warren Hamilton Daily Mai, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Catherine Whiteside The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 5, 11/04/2013; Ms Lynne Hales v Daily Mail, Clause 6, 11/04/2013; Emilie Sandy v The Citizen (Gloucester)… [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 12:10 pm by hls
Courts overwhelmed by unrepresented litigants 10:51- Good progress — several states enact legislation that earmark returns from filing fees to legal services. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 12:59 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Rodney Turner, No. 102,478 (Wyandotte)State appeal (petition for review)James L. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:24 am by Susan Brenner
Turner determined there were no mechanical deficiencies that would have contributed to the collision.People v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
 Other notable Offer of Amends cases include Winslet v Associated Newspapers [2009] EWHC 2735 where he found that the court did have power to order a statement in open court under the offer of amends regime in Kate Winslet’s case and Turner v NGN [2005] EWHC 892 where the newspaper had falsely claimed that Mr Turner pressurised his wife into having sex with other men and a discount of 40% was applied under the offer of amends regime. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:26 am
Archbold 4-447 (f) suggests that where asked a judge should offer an explanation: “a reasonable doubt is the sort of doubt that might affect the mind of the of a person in dealing with matters of importance in his own affairs” Walters v R. [read post]