Search for: "Tenant v. State" Results 721 - 740 of 2,686
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2009, 4:53 am by GGCSMB&R
An employee of the tenant testified that booster fans did not break down on a regular basis. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:50 am by Jon Gelman
 As the professional sports conglomerates spread their political influence from state house to state house demolishing the basic tenants of workers’ compensation.They continue their effort to bar injured players from seeking basic workers’ compensation benefits for known occupational risks,.They are now bragging about a mere 13% reduction. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 1:50 am by Adam Burrage, Olswang LLP
The difficulty with this case arises from s 28(3)(a), which states that both valuations (mentioned above) are made on the basis that the landlord is selling his interest on the open market to a willing buyer. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
The District Judge’s order stated that the court found that Ms Boyle was and had been a secure tenant of the Highbury flat within the meaning of section 79 of the 1985 Act. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
The District Judge’s order stated that the court found that Ms Boyle was and had been a secure tenant of the Highbury flat within the meaning of section 79 of the 1985 Act. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:47 am by Siobhan Hayes
 It has ruled on what ‘repairs’ are but the judgment will not give many investors clarity over what their rates liability could be during refurbishment works.The case is Newbigin v S J and J Monk. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:47 am by Siobhan Hayes
 It has ruled on what ‘repairs’ are but the judgment will not give many investors clarity over what their rates liability could be during refurbishment works.The case is Newbigin v S J and J Monk. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:47 am by Siobhan Hayes
 It has ruled on what ‘repairs’ are but the judgment will not give many investors clarity over what their rates liability could be during refurbishment works.The case is Newbigin v S J and J Monk. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:17 pm by John Jascob
According to the complaint, the offering materials “favorably portrayed Phoenix’s business, emphasizing its focus on residents and customer service,” despite tenants complaints concerning “Phoenix’s practice of signing them up for bank loans without their knowledge or authorization and using the loan proceeds to fund its operations, while tenants unwittingly repaid the loans in monthly installments akin to rent. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 5:25 am
If you think landlord-tenant law is bad, trying getting a liquor license in the City of New York. [read post]