Search for: "Tenant v. State"
Results 721 - 740
of 3,335
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2009, 1:50 am
"There have been suggestions, following on from the Sheffield Case (Harvey v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 1:47 am
One tenant of the pier, Stylus Sports Ltd, did not agree with decision. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:43 am
The court explained that there is extreme deference given to the legislature and that a rational legislator could have concluded that the Ordinance would further the stated goals of protecting tenants. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:53 pm
Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:07 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 2:48 am
State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 12:40 pm
Ms W was CA’s assured tenant. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:27 pm
As an illustration of the perils of a claim in nuisance, here is Yianni v Shakeshaft [2014] EWCA Civ 1639 [Not on Bailii. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 6:25 am
State of New York [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
Va. 1985); andthe Lundberg test recently adopted by the Kansas Court of Appeals, which unifies these two approaches (State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 1:10 am
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 12:49 am
See paragraph 13(a) of my decision in RJ v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2012] AACR 28. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
Bedford v Paragon Asra Housing Ltd (LANDLORD AND TENANT – BREACH OF COVENANT – shared ownership lease) (2021) UKUT 266 An interesting Upper Tribunal appeal decision on whether the Tribunal can proceed to make a determination of breach of lease under section 168 Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 where there has been a waiver of the breach by the applicant landlord. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
Bedford v Paragon Asra Housing Ltd (LANDLORD AND TENANT – BREACH OF COVENANT – shared ownership lease) (2021) UKUT 266 An interesting Upper Tribunal appeal decision on whether the Tribunal can proceed to make a determination of breach of lease under section 168 Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 where there has been a waiver of the breach by the applicant landlord. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:22 am
Regime v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 12:08 pm
This stated that corporations renting premises on behalf of occupants who for various reasons could not be named tenants only were entitled to Rent Stabilization where the lease specifies a particular individual on the lease. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 12:15 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKLandlord/Tenant Law
HUD Renovation Rule 'Patently Unconstitutional'; Court Opines as to Required Due Process to Tenants
Linares v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
But on the 50-year anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 5:25 am
In South Road Assoc., LLC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 9:16 am
In this case (Loblaws Inc. v. [read post]
