Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Miller"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,707
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
From Keisel v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:29 am
Ever since the Court issued its decision in D.C. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 3:43 am
See, e.g., People v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:01 pm
Courts have upheld requirements for a probationer to share social media passwords with their supervising officer, e.g., People v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:46 pm
Louisiana, the juvenile life-without-parole case that applied Miller v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 10:09 pm
Louisiana, the juvenile life-without-parole case that applied Miller v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
By Marty Miller Four years after fully embracing international copyright exhaustion in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
By Marty Miller Four years after fully embracing international copyright exhaustion in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
By Marty Miller Four years after fully embracing international copyright exhaustion in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:28 am
(Note: Miller Starr Regalia attorneys Ken Stahl and Matt Henderson represented intervenors YIMBY Law and People for Housing Orange County (a chapter of YIMBY Action) in the Olen litigation.) [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In Perry and United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 9:29 am
We therefore doubt that Smith and Miller extend this far. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 6:34 am
There is no way to know how many people have used ivi rather than sanctioned methods to watch plaintiffs’ programming, or how many people have used ivi to watch programming that should not have been available in their geographic area. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 2:11 pm
Supreme Court Case Miller v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 7:55 am
People v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm
Miller v Associated Newspapers, 10 and 11 December 2013 (Maurice Kay, Moore-Bick and Lloyd-Jones LJJ) Kneafsey v Independent Television, 11 December 2013 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 5:15 am
Most conduct that people would consider public corruption, virtually all conduct, is governed by the federal laws already. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:00 pm
Burt was involved with obscenity defense before Miller v. [read post]
31 Aug 2024, 4:04 pm
The need to consider the value of the book as a whole, or its literary, scientific or political value, is part of the obscenity test outlined in the 1973 US Supreme Court case Miller v California. [read post]
