Search for: "Tran v. State" Results 721 - 740 of 1,232
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
Private copying levy systems are not harmonised in the EU, and some Member States do not even collect levies or decided to get rid of them altogether. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 2:35 pm by Cody M. Poplin
” The New York Times reports that the Supreme Court heard arguments in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 4:13 am by Ben
 Current TPP negotiation member states are the United States, Japan, Mexico, Canada, Australia, Malaysia, Chile, Singapore, Peru, Vietnam, New Zealand and Brunei. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:21 am by Mark Ashton
You may live in a state which has no restrictions on trans-gender therapy for your child. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am by Larry Catá Backer
Globalization has opened holes in the walls that used to serve to police and protect states and their power authority. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
Coyle (University of North Carolina School of Law), The Canons of Construction for Choice-of-Law Clauses    On International Arbitration Csongor István Nagy (University of Szeged), Central European Perspectives on Investor-State Arbitration: Practical Experiences and Theoretical Concerns Evangelos Kyveris (University College London), An In-Depth Analysis on the Conflicting Decisions in Dallah v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Tran Huong Quynh, 2020 WL 4474485 (M.D. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 6:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
The case that may provide the best support for the State's contention is Trans Union Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:46 am by Fiona de Londras
European consensus reasoning was used in other areas of LGBT rights advocacy in the past (especially in re trans rights) and, where the Court recognises a tipping point where there is a hefty movement by states towards marriage equality then it is likely to revise this finding as it did with trans rights (for a brief summary of LGBT rights jurisprudence in the ECtHR see Part II of my article here). [read post]