Search for: "U. S. v. Choice"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,019
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2012, 12:35 pm
But before attention faded, there was a fairly vigorous discussion, with the best and most thorough analysis in an early article by Pam Samuelson, Allocating Ownership Rights in Computer-Generated Works, 47 U. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 5:18 am
” United Foods, 533 U. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
A union’s duty of fair representation County of Tompkins and Tompkins County Sheriff and Tompkins County Deputy Sheriff’s Association, Inc., 44 PERB ¶3024, U-28437, U-28483 The Board affirmed the dismissal of a charge by the Tompkins County Deputy Sheriff’s Association, Inc. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:03 pm
Stern, Liberty v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 9:13 am
The Supreme Court’s unanimous decision released today in Freeman v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 5:51 am
Verdone, 2012 NY Slip Op 50728(U)(Sup.Ct. [read post]
18 May 2012, 5:51 am
Verdone, 2012 NY Slip Op 50728(U)(Sup.Ct. [read post]
14 May 2012, 12:25 pm
Sandager v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am
The phrase involuntarily leapt to mind when I read the recent post-trial decision by Suffolk County Commercial Division Justice Emily Pines in Suffolk Anesthesiology Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:31 am
Defendant’s name also continued to appear in the press. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:13 am
The seamless congruity between party affiliation and asserted constitutional grievance, viewed against the backdrop of the political u-turns key Republicans took to get there, are at the very least a signal the possiblity that partisanship has escaped the confines of the legislature, that the plaintiffs seek to win in the courts the battle their brethren-in-arms lost in the Congress, and that the case presents policy choices vested in elected legislators, not constitutional issues… [read post]
3 May 2012, 7:13 am
Board of Education, 333 U.S. 203 (1948) (quoting Thomas Jefferson’s Letter to the Danbury Baptist Association dated Jan. 1, 1802); Reynolds v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 4:26 am
Del Istmo Assurance Corp. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:04 am
They observed that an unconscionable contract is one "which is so grossly unreasonable as to be unenforcible because of an absence of meaningful choice on part of one of the parties together with contract terms which are unreasonably favorable to the other party" ( King v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 8:19 am
Substance abuse: abuse v. dependence, etc. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:16 am
In Farrakhan v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 11:09 am
As a result of the 1973 case Gagnon v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
Jon's article follows. [read post]
