Search for: "U.S. v. English*" Results 721 - 740 of 2,885
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2020, 9:17 am by Eunice Cho
The new NDS has improved some provisions for guaranteeing telephone access to detainees in order to find counsel, although they fall short of the requirements outlined in a settlement to Lyon v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by The Action Group on Access to Justice
These issues are important because of the examples of AI being used in civil and administrative government decision-making in the U.S. and Europe. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am by Hannah Kris, William Ford
The subcommittee will hear testimony from Brian Hastings, the chief of law enforcement operations at U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
On December 19, 2019, a New York federal district court judge denied the U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
On December 19, 2019, a New York federal district court judge denied the U.S. [read post]
As former Justice Benjamin Curtis, who dissented in Dred Scott v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 1:43 pm by Hannah Kris
” which examines U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm
., Metamorphoseos, from Latin Metamorphoses (plural).transform (v.)mid-14c., "change the form of" (transitive), from Old French transformer (14c.), from Latin transformare "change in shape, metamorphose," from trans "across, beyond" (see trans-) + formare "to form" (see form (v.)). [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
  The word is rich with meaning, meaning that shifts subtly over the long arc of its engagement with the cultures that have used the word as the sign toward which meaning (and metaphor) could be attached.impeach (v.)formerly also empeach, late 14c., empechen, "to impede, hinder, prevent;" early 15c., "cause to be stuck, run (a ship) aground," also "prevent (from doing something)," from Anglo-French empecher, Old French empeechier "to hinder,… [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
The EPC has no explicit provision preventing double patenting by the same applicant of the same invention; not by two applications filed on the same date but not connected via priority or otherwise, not by two applications filed on different dates but linked by priority (so having the same effective date but different filing date), not by by two applications filed on different dates but with the same filing date (i.e., a parent and a divisional). [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 11:16 am by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
Summer Volunteer Legal Internship, U.S. [read post]