Search for: "US LEGALIZATION INC." Results 721 - 740 of 29,475
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2024, 11:15 am by Logan Castellanos
The caveat for allowing the approval of GE corn only for certain uses directly puts the responsibility onto individual producers to ensure that any GE corn used in Mexico will not be used for dough and tortillas. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 6:44 am by INFORRM
  There was a report of the case on Stuff And three “bonus” cases from the US: US Dominion, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 10:10 am by Sherica Celine
Labor & Employment Key Legal Development Tracker – keep up to date with key legal developments! [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:24 am by Eric Goldman
Snap, and many other cases, it’s impossible to disaggregate the plaintiffs’ legal theories from Snapchat’s publication of the drug dealers’ content. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:10 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
This last category includes records that are used to make decisions about any individuals, whether or not the records have been used to make a decision about the particular individual requesting access. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:08 pm by Kevin O'Keefe
I can arrange for you to trial this on the LexBlog, Inc. platform. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:18 am by Unknown
A shareholder proposal submitted on behalf of the AFL-CIO Equity Index Funds ("AFL-CIO") asked that Apple Inc. prepare a transparency report on its use of AI in its business operations and disclose any ethical guidelines Apple adopted regarding its use of AI technology. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
In a recent legal case involving Illinois Plaintiff, SAK Group, Inc. and Indiana Defendant, Blue Hill Hospitality, Inc., the complexities of trademark infringement and its legal implications came to the forefront. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Real Talk Entertainment, Inc., 85 AD3d 561, 562 [1st Dept 2011]). [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
Though the case settled in 2017, US District Judge Loretta Preska held that there was no legal justification for the names of Epstein’s associates to remain redacted. [read post]