Search for: "US v. Golden"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,808
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
See Witkoff v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
” With the last of 2014’s grim detritus behind us, let us press on to the New Year’s new relists, of which there were a lucky thirteen. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 10:51 am
Bob of Cleveland Church, as long as the location is used as a church. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 8:26 am
The first recent case is State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 7:06 am
" Unimed Pharmaceuticals LLC et al v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:28 am
The court also granted class certification, for settlement purposes; approved a proposed notice to class members; and signed off on plaintiffs’ firm Outten & Golden as class counsel (Ballinger v Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc, dba Condé Nast Publications, December 29, 2014, Pitman, H). [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 4:14 am
Like me, Randazza — who was my counsel in Rakofsky v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 12:52 pm
In Sheppard v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
As Shalini Bengani explains in this post,TufAmerica Inc v W B Music Corp 13-cv-7847(LAK), decided by the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, is another one of those cases. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 12:33 pm
v=_w7qPokZL7M The Freedom Group’s CEO is George Kollitides. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 8:50 am
Case citation: Bell v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Fellow blogger, tweeter and IP enthusiast Thomas Dubuissontells us about a larger than life dispute between Google and Oracle that is rumbling through the courts in the US. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 3:27 am
” Thomas v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 1:57 am
It was in the federal matter of United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 9:52 am
The Supreme Court’s decision this week in R. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
* Idenix v Gilead - Patent profoundly invalidDefine ‘Arnoldian’. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 12:02 am
From his opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 6:51 pm
Colby & Co. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
Mercks clash over law governing coexistence dealThe Merck v Merck trade mark dispute (real name: Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and others) has already appeared a couple of times on this weblog [see here and here], with the further honour to have a dedicated poll on who between the Germans and the Americans should have right to use that much-contended name. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 9:45 pm
Eva Kassoti, Unilateral Legal Acts Revisited: Common Law v. [read post]
