Search for: "Under Seal 1 v. United States" Results 721 - 740 of 850
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2010, 8:42 am by On the Net
A member of the military forces of the United States or of any state of the United States in the performance of official duties; or 3. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:49 pm by Steve Vladeck
With those concerns in mind, Reinhard first unsuccessfully sought rehearing en banc (with the support of the United States as amicus curiae), before filing a petition for certiorari. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
  Under the pretext of food safety, the legislation will facilitate the off-shoring of our food supply, allowing powerful transnational corporations to move commodities and finished products more easily between their international subsidiaries, greasing the way for further concentration of the market. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:31 am by admin
  The best is enemy of the good:   More than a dozen projects under way as part of a 10-year-old federal and district restoration effort have been suspended or canceled in anticipation of the cost of the United States Sugar deal. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:46 pm by Rick
  Entering a home, entering a car, or opening a sealed package is normally considered a search that the Fourth Amendment regulates with either a warrant requirement or probable cause. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:26 am
Anascape has conceded that if not so entitled, the '700 patent claims are subject to invalidation based on the intervening prior art of a Sony "DualShock" controller sold in the United States in 1998 and described in a patent application of Goto published in 1998, and a Sony "DualShock 2" controller sold in the United States in October 2000. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:45 am by Daniel W. Whitney, Esquire
Yet a highly effective mechanism exists for recovery of funds to the United States Treasury while simultaneously providing a significant economic incentive for the person who files suit. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
The two companies will also pay a combined $3.3 million civil penalty to the United States as well as to Alabama and Louisiana, and $200,000 to Louisiana organ [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:38 am by J
It cannot be signed by someone under a power of attorney (St Ermins Property Company Ltd v Tingay [2002] EWHC 1673 (Ch); [2002] HLR 11) or any agency agreement (Cascades & Quayside Ltd v Cascades Freehold Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 1555; [2008] L&TR 23). [read post]