Search for: "United States v. Gross"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,641
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2012, 5:17 am
Summary Opinion of the United States Tax Court in the case of Flores V. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 1:01 pm
United Contractors Corp. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:32 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 1:06 pm
Cf. the pompous, confused, Delphic, and ultimately verging on useless analysis that Justice Cardozo offered in Welch v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 5:58 pm
The new case is Gross v. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 10:00 am
Everson v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:22 am
Co. v J & S United Amusement Corp., 67 NY2d 1044, 1046 [1986]; accord Allstate Ins. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 10:31 am
Co., 140 A.D.2d 167, 168, 527 N.Y.S.2d 420, 421 (1st Dep't 1988) 3 United States Fidel. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 10:31 am
Co., 140 A.D.2d 167, 168, 527 N.Y.S.2d 420, 421 (1st Dep't 1988) 3 United States Fidel. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:03 pm
To qualify for a tax benefit, a project must either have twenty percent or more of the units under rent control and occupied by individuals with incomes of one-half or less of the median gross income in the local area, or have forty percent or more of the units under rent control and occupied by individuals with incomes sixty percent or less of the area’s median gross income. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 7:48 am
In its June 17, 2020 decision in Matter of Abramson v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:39 am
United States, 562 U.S. ___, 131 S. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
The SDNY’s Criminal Information and Sentencing Memorandum in Cohen’s case also discussed the reimbursement being “‘grossed up’ for tax purposes. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 3:54 pm
From Warren v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 9:00 am
Introduction Depending on how the Court resolves a threshold issue, United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 2:56 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 11:56 am
To say that the case divided the Justices would be a gross understatement. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 6:33 am
Macy's saving grace was based on the United States and the California Constitutions, which both prevent discriminatory tax schemes like this one, typically referred to as a "tandem tax. [read post]
