Search for: "United States v. Joe"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,304
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2016, 7:04 am
Trader Joe’s Co. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 12:38 pm
Here's a neat little trademark case from earlier today.Michael Hallett lives in Washington state, buys a ton of products from Trader Joe's stores, drives 'em across the border to Canada, and then sells them (at a huge markup) in his own store -- called "Pirate Joe's" -- that has a nearly identical logo to Trader Joe's. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 12:07 pm
In Padilla v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 7:33 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 10:41 am
Here is the opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 11:43 am
Hogue pressed upon the importance of the election for preserving Roe v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:41 pm
** A Return to the Limits of In Re Tobacco II? [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 5:22 pm
In Utah v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 5:42 am
As I explain in the post, within hours after Ali refused to step forward for military induction, the New York State Athletic Commission withdrew his license to fight on the ground that licensing a man who refused induction was “detrimental to the best interests of boxing”; and, within days, every important state boxing commission in the nation had followed suit, thereby effectively preventing Ali from fighting in the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 8:17 pm
Muhammad Ali v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Within days, every important state boxing commission in the nation had followed suit, effectively preventing Ali from fighting in the United States. [read post]
16 May 2016, 4:00 am
In Killer Joe Nevada LLC v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 4:00 am
In Killer Joe Nevada LLC v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 4:00 am
In Killer Joe Nevada LLC v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm
On 10 May 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard applications in the cases of Ghuman v Ghuman and Hussain v Feeney. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:15 pm
While the Supreme Court recently held in Rodriguez v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:03 am
The Court will not reach the merits of the DAPA case, United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 11:16 am
This precise issue was addressed by the Supreme Court in Marbury v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm
The Spanish Supreme Court has ruled in favour of Google Spain on the right to be forgotten, which means that claims concerning the right to be forgotten should be submitted directly to Google Inc in the United States. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 4:09 pm
In Hoffman v Challis [2016] NSWSC 142 made various rulings on imputations pleaded by the plaintiff. [read post]
