Search for: "United States v. Peoples" Results 721 - 740 of 20,764
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2013, 3:29 pm by CAPTAIN
  "In rejecting Smallwood’s Fourth Amendment challenge, the district court relied upon United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 1:34 pm
She was happy to say: "I, Brianna Bolden-Hardge, vow to uphold the Constitutions of the United States and of the State of California while working in my role as an employee of the State Controller’s Office. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 2:39 pm
United States(1961) 368 U.S.208, 229 (Black, J., dissenting). [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 2:00 pm by Bexis
As we had hoped, the United States Supreme Court agreed today to review the First Circuit's remarkable ruling in Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 10:22 am by Brandon Gatto
The goal of the endeavor is to counteract the 2010 US Supreme Court [official website] decision of Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 6:42 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
New York will be moot, as the Biden Administration will not exclude people who are in the United States illegally from the reapportionment calculations. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 9:41 pm
  Purposeful discrimination is prohibited under the Equal Protection Clause - the United States Constitution. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 11:52 am by Andrew Hamm
United States (Fourth Amendment, electronic privacy), and City of Hays, Kansas v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 6:49 am by Layla Kuhl
The Michigan Supreme Court dismissed one application for leave to appeal based on the parties’ stipulation, granted five motions for brief filing extensions and vacated its 2009 opinion in People v Bryant in accordance with the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm by Donald Thompson
As we know, under the due process clauses of the New York State Constitution, Article I, § 6, and the United States Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, evidence of a pretrial identification of the defendant is inadmissible if the procedure used is “unnecessarily suggestive” (Neil v Biggers, 409 US 188 [1972]; People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241 [1981]; People v Owens, 74 NY2d 677 [1989]; People v… [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 2:44 pm
Good --Notes and Questions --A Note on Legalization of Hierarchies of Law Through Statutes --Constitution of the United States --Indiana Code --Notes and Questions --PruneYard Shopping Center v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Gore repeated McPherson’s historical amnesia and provoked a doctrine that directly threatens such core democratic values as state court authority to interpret state constitutions and the power of the people to elect the President of the United States. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]