Search for: "United States v. Price" Results 721 - 740 of 5,317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2017, 7:46 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
According to the Court, an authorized sale outside the United States, just as one within the United States, exhausts all rights under the Patent Act. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:33 am by Antitrust Today
The landmark United States Supreme Court decision that is expected to be a death blow for class action arbitrations has apparently claimed its first victim, the case itself. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 9:29 am by Steven Cohen
Nuvasive, Inc. et al – United States District Court – Southern District of California – February 1st, 2018) involves a claim of securities fraud. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
New Hampshire has the highest level of outbound smuggling at 65 percent of consumption, likely due to its relatively low tax rates and proximity to high-tax states in the northeastern United States. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, attorneys from the Paul Weiss law firm review a recent Second Circuit decision on this issue, Waggoner v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:24 am by Guest Barista
Essentially Costco had purchased watches meant for international markets other than the United States (hence the lower price) and sold it in the U.S. at prices lower than offered by other U.S. distributors. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
Agrium Inc., et al., No. 10-1712 (7th Cir. 2012) (en banc), is a decision of all the active sitting Judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:51 am by Antitrust Today
The Supreme Court of Canada has denied defendants leave to appeal from the British Columbia Court of Appeal’s certification decision in Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v Infineon Technologies AG – the DRAM price-fixing class action. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 8:02 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitOpinion Date: 8/11/10Cite: Mayer Hoffman McCann, P.C. v. [read post]