Search for: "United States v. Price"
Results 721 - 740
of 5,808
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2011, 7:42 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and John V. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 4:02 pm
" Such a result is particularly undesirable, AAI further explains, because the United States is likely to argue that "a price squeeze should be eliminated as an independent antitrust offense" - an issue that AAI "has vigorously contested . . . in its brief" but which respondents did not address. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:57 am
The fact that finished cell phones were sold in the United states did not amount to a “direct effect” on U.S. commerce because “the effect of component price fixing on the price of the product of which it is a component is indirect”. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:01 am
A recent United States Tax Court case, Gaines v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:37 am
On November 27, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in the matter of U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 4:53 am
And even the Ninth Circuit’s anticipated decision may not finally resolve the matter, as the issue could ultimately reach the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 1:07 pm
Second, the United States Supreme Court finally released its decision in Quanta Computer, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
The case of Epic Games v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:43 am
In the United States, rebates are negotiated by PBMs, whose function is to define formularies on behalf of health insurers. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 11:17 am
In Steginsky v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:13 pm
By Jason Rantanen VirnetX, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:16 am
Currently there are 500 charging stations in the United States and 400 of them are in California. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:32 am
By Brian VillaIn Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 12:42 pm
§ 2 (2006), by willfully maintaining its monopoly power in the market for the sale of drugs for the treatment of PDA in the United States, and that Lundbeck’s conduct violated state law. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:00 am
In Desta v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
In Curry v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 8:25 am
In WIT Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 8:16 am
United States v. [read post]
