Search for: "United States v. Sample" Results 721 - 740 of 2,002
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
     PIRATES OF THE CARRIBEAN AND THE TEST OF SUBSTANTIAL SIMILARITYThe United States District Court for the Central District of California went on to rule that Walt Disney’s “Pirates of the Caribbean” had not lifted copyrighted elements from the screenplay of the same name. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 6:22 pm
Colb In my column for this week, I discuss the case of United States v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 6:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
United Parcel Service, Inc., --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2010 WL 6568293 (W.D. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 1:56 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The question of whether or not a law enforcement agency's failure to follow its own sobriety checkpoint guidelines renders the stop unlawful under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution or article I (§ 12) of the New York Constitution appears to one of first impression in New York. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 1:28 pm
  Under § 101.9(g), "[t]he sample for nutrient analysis shall consist of a composite of 12 subsamples (consumer units), taken 1 from each of 12 randomly chosen shipping cases, to be representative of a lot. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:18 pm by Jon Sands
United States, 131 S. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 5:03 am
This time round it's patent attorney Suleman Ali (Holly IP), who has been taking another look at life in the United States in the wake of that great nation's Guidance on Eligibility. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:26 am by SOG Staff
  Earlier this week the United States Supreme Court held in Hurst v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:26 am by SOG Staff
  Earlier this week the United States Supreme Court held in Hurst v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 6:03 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
United States will address whether the federal government has sovereign immunity from lawsuits for intentional wrongful acts by prison guards acting as law enforcement officials. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 2:52 am
 Specifically, on December 4, the ECHR issued its decision, S. and Marper v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Beth Graham
These are just samples of the types of questions that might come up at the AT&T Mobility oral argument. [read post]
23 May 2018, 10:25 am by Scott R. Anderson, Megan Reiss
This is decidedly not the case, however, when it comes to the United States’s own use of nuclear weapons. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:43 pm by Richard D. Friedman
The certificate cannot be admitted consistently with the Confrontation Clause unless a witness with personal knowledge – presumably but not necessarily the author of the certificate – testifies to both propositions.A recent opinion usefully summarizing the decisions on this matter, and coming to the proper result, is United States v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
Over at The Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Volokh reported on the Second Circuit’s recent opinion in United States v. [read post]