Search for: "United States v. State of Alabama"
Results 721 - 740
of 2,048
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2017, 10:43 am
Alabama 16-9304 Issue: Whether, when the Alabama Supreme Court failed to apply the reasoning and analysis mandated by the Supreme Court’s decision in Foster v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:01 pm
The State presented Sergeant Steven Schafer of the IMPD Computer and Digital Forensic Unit to testify as an expert in forensic analysis of social media records and digital trails. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 2:03 pm
However, five states continued the practice: Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, Texas, and Virginia. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 11:33 am
A date with the Supreme Court: Florida v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 3:00 am
Earlier this year, the News Roundup noted that the United States Supreme Court held in Hurst v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 3:00 am
Earlier this year, the News Roundup noted that the United States Supreme Court held in Hurst v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 2:07 pm
Perez (Cultural Resources; Native American Graves Protection Act) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html Matter of Welfare of Children A.J.J. ( Indian Child Welfare Act; Minnesota Indian Family Preservation Act) In re M. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 9:29 am
United States, 527 U.S. 373, 380-381 (1999) (interpreting 18 U.S.C. [read post]
14 May 2025, 10:43 am
Oregon statutorily defines a security to include “investment contracts” (see ORS 59.015), and its courts use a modified version of a test established by the United States Supreme Court in SEC v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 6:53 am
Yesterday’s case is United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:54 am
United States, a situation we discussed in an earlier on this blog. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:17 am
Attorneys and state attorneys general. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 5:51 am
United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932), which is codified at section 775.021(4)(a) of the Florida Statutes, requires that each charged offense include an element the other does not.FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ V. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Section One straightforwardly provides: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Moving beyond the bare text, it is important, even (maybe especially) a hundred years later, to think more about what the Amendment really sought to constitutionally accomplish, and how its full import has not been deeply understood. [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 11:34 am
Ocean State Tactical, LLC v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
United States, 296 F.3d 1237 (11th Cir. 2002). [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 1:00 pm
Prior to H.B. 232, Kentucky was one of only four states—including Alabama, New Mexico, and South Dakota—that had not adopted data breach notification legislation. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:01 am
(in support of petitioner) Amicus brief of National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation (in support of petitioner) Amicus brief of the United States (in support of petitioner) To access filings in the Riley case, click the links below. [read post]
