Search for: "Virginia Supreme Court"
Results 721 - 740
of 13,092
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2023, 6:33 am
As I explained in my Cato Supreme Court Review article on the decision, the Chief Justice treated the QD as an on-off switch: If a question is "major," suddenly a higher threshold applies. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 5:47 am
But the Supreme Court cases recognizing this right confine it to narrow fields, such as education, Meyer v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:30 pm
A widely read thread by Rachel Sheldon, Penn State, prompted by the use of history in recent Supreme Court decisions.Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 5:11 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Biden v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
Supreme Court decision, ruled: “Intangible harms can also be concrete, including when they ‘are injuries with a close relationship to harms traditionally recognized as providing a basis for lawsuits in American courts,’ such as ‘reputational harms, disclosure of private information, and intrusion upon seclusion. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 1:00 pm
I contrast the vision of the Supreme Court that Alexander Bickel defended with the current approach. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:00 am
As we wrote almost exactly a year ago – months before the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued its proposed noncompete rule – the Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:56 am
As we wrote almost exactly a year ago – months before the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued its proposed noncompete rule – the Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:35 am
There is much to unpack in the Supreme Court’s decision in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
To this day, the Supreme Court has somehow managed to avoid resolving this issue. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:54 pm
The Supervisory Power of the Supreme Court, Columbia Law Review (2006). [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 6:57 am
The Declaration had to be explained away–quite unconvincingly–by the Supreme Court in Dred Scott. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 3:25 pm
Supreme Court, which upheld the Pennsylvania state law. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:35 pm
In any event, this case may yet return to the Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 5:28 am
When the Court handed down West Virginia, it announced a new tool of statutory interpretation—the MQD. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 1:53 pm
The supposedly-conservative 5-4 majority of the Supreme Court, in case after case, swung to the left: McGirt, Mazars, Vance, June Medical, Regents, Bostock, and so on. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 1:13 pm
Its roots are in the Supreme Court's 1943 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 10:24 am
Of course, we're also continuing to review articles that are unrelated to this Supreme Court Term's cases. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 3:28 pm
[So the Indiana Supreme Court held yesterday, though it concluded that, as to abortion, this is limited to situations where the abortion is necessary to protect the woman's life or health.] [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 3:49 am
As in the Court’s recent decision in West Virginia v. [read post]