Search for: "WILLIAM O"
Results 721 - 740
of 5,916
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
When the Supreme Court affirmed summarily in Rosen, Justices William Rehnquist and Byron White concurred even though they had dissented in Roe—"[u]nder the compulsion of Roe. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 2:15 pm
Appellant Glaser Weil Fink Howard Avchen & Shapiro, LLC (Glaser Weil), former counsel of plaintiff William Rice, appeals from an order disgorging a $450,000 payment to Glaser Weil by Triton Community Development LLC (Triton), an entity owned and controlled by Rice. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 1:00 pm
Thanks to my research assistants for help reading and coding all of the court’s decisions especially Matt Fuentes, Daniel Kieffer, Brenna Kingyon, Lindsay Kriz, Sara Leibee, Ryan Meger, Madison Murhammer Colon, Charles Neff, Riley Stanton, Connor Williams & Allison Williamson. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 6:51 am
Over the past year, Beijing clipped the wings of its once high-flying technology giants in a dramatic clash between public and private power. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 7:45 am
Stebbins is one of our ‘sacred cows’.1923 O. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 5:15 pm
The lone dissent came from Justice John Marshall Harlan, who wrote that the law was passed with the intention of excluding Black passengers, adding that “[n]o one would be so wanting in candor as to assert the contrary. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 3:47 am
William Shen, the CEO of Respondent ACIGI, filed the underlying application and then assigned the registration to ACIGI soon after issuance. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Finally, although Williams and Harrison dealt with slightly different government conduct, they clearly established that frivolous legal and regulatory actions taken by local government against citizens in retaliation for petitioning violate the First Amendment…. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
In this decisions the Appellate Division explains that "[n]o appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Budin v Davis, 172 AD3d 1676, 1679 [2019]) and, therefore, the only issue before it in its considering this action was the propriety of the Supreme Court's denial of petitioner's motion to renew. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
In this decisions the Appellate Division explains that "[n]o appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Budin v Davis, 172 AD3d 1676, 1679 [2019]) and, therefore, the only issue before it in its considering this action was the propriety of the Supreme Court's denial of petitioner's motion to renew. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
In this decisions the Appellate Division explains that "[n]o appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Budin v Davis, 172 AD3d 1676, 1679 [2019]) and, therefore, the only issue before it in its considering this action was the propriety of the Supreme Court's denial of petitioner's motion to renew. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
In this decisions the Appellate Division explains that "[n]o appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Budin v Davis, 172 AD3d 1676, 1679 [2019]) and, therefore, the only issue before it in its considering this action was the propriety of the Supreme Court's denial of petitioner's motion to renew. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 9:16 am
• Carl O. [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
In this decisions the Appellate Division explains that "[n]o appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Budin v Davis, 172 AD3d 1676, 1679 [2019]) and, therefore, the only issue before it in its considering this action was the propriety of the Supreme Court's denial of petitioner's motion to renew. [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
In this decisions the Appellate Division explains that "[n]o appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Budin v Davis, 172 AD3d 1676, 1679 [2019]) and, therefore, the only issue before it in its considering this action was the propriety of the Supreme Court's denial of petitioner's motion to renew. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 7:40 am
In this case arising from a high-profile incident where William Joseph Barber was convicted of second-degree trespass for refusing to leave the office area of the General Assembly while leading a protest related to health care policy after being told to leave by security personnel for violating a building rule prohibiting causing disturbances, the Court of Appeals found that the superior court had subject matter jurisdiction to conduct the trial and that the trial was free from… [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 3:32 pm
O'Grady (6th Cir. 2019). [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 3:27 pm
It is noted that Global had run this argument (and some of the the others) in another RRO case, William Road (LON/00AG/HMF/2021/0042) and lost in the FTT, but had been given permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal on the ‘sole use’ point only. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 2:37 pm
(James Mellett, Cheryl Mack, Brendan Leier)Shame and Secrecy of Do Not Resuscitate Orders: An Historical Review and Suggestions for the Future (John Albert O'Connor)MAiD in Canada: Ethical Considerations in Medical Assistance in Dying (William Robert Nielsen) [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
Black, Stanley Reed, Felix Frankfurter, William O. [read post]
