Search for: "Walker v. United States" Results 721 - 740 of 1,201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2012, 6:53 am by Richard Montes
United States, 293 F. 1013 (DC 1923)—or the foundation rule set by the state Court of Appeals in Parker v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:33 pm by Lovechilde
” Today, the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit upheld Judge Walker's ruling. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:59 am by David Lat
Proposition 8, which “violates the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution,” is unconstitutional. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 6:41 pm by Edward A. Fallone
  If anything, the ongoing saga of Friends of Scott Walker v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 2:51 pm by Phil Cave
The NMCCA has issued a published opinion in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 2:47 pm by Viking
The NMCCA has issued a published opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 7:43 am by Elizabeth A. Wilson
The Fourth Circuit’s decision here leans heavily on two Supreme Court precedents involving Bivens and the military context, United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 1:38 pm
The Court held that the Rendine decision permitting attorney fee enhancements remains valid and has not been altered by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Perdue v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:43 am
Bottom Line:   In Walker, Truesdell, Roth & Associates and Hobart Truesdell (“Trustees”) v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am by Candace Cathey
handle=hein.journals/usflr29&collection=journals&id=661 "Martin Luther King, Walker v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:14 am
This position is to be contrasted with other jurisdictions such as the United States which has varying degrees of protection for personality rights and the right of publicity at state level. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:56 pm
Begging the question, does the next age in software protection belong to copyright (see Apple v Psystar, Oracle v Google)? [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am by Aaron Tang
Its single complaint about the interim map, that it fails to consider state requirements that county boundaries be respected, has long been rejected as a matter of both Voting Rights Act and constitutional (Gray v. [read post]