Search for: "Walsh v. Walsh" Results 721 - 740 of 1,717
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2009, 8:56 pm by Sex Crimes
The constitutional issues were previously decided by the Eleventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 6:20 am by James Romoser
The justices return to the virtual bench for oral arguments, starting Monday at 10 a.m. with Pham v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"When presented with a question of statutory interpretation, a court's primary consideration is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the Legislature" (Matter of Walsh v New York State Comptroller, 34 NY3d 520, 524 [2019] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048 [3d Dept 2024]). [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"When presented with a question of statutory interpretation, a court's primary consideration is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the Legislature" (Matter of Walsh v New York State Comptroller, 34 NY3d 520, 524 [2019] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048 [3d Dept 2024]). [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney who violates a disciplinary rule may be discharged for cause and is not entitled to any fees for services rendered (see Quinn v Walsh, 18 AD3d 638; Matter of Satin, 265 AD2d 330; Yannitelli v Yannitelli & Sons Constr. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
According to attorney Joseph Walsh of Walsh Pancio, an attorney who defends a number of construction defect claims, these implied warranty claims are generally at the center of complaints filed by homeowner plaintiffs. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:22 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But the termination of plaintiff's employment certainly is enough.The case is Sotomayor v. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 9:54 am by Karen Gullo
“Section 1201 is an unconstitutional restraint on speech because it blocks a wide range of legitimate, noninfringing expression,” said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Kit Walsh. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 9:01 am
Grooms and hotwalkers employed by thoroughbred horse trainer Steve Asmussen were awarded $200,000 plus in overtime pay in a trial court judgment affirmed by the Sixth Circuit in Walsh v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 10:49 am by Brian Shiffrin
Fine twice challenged the statute at the New York Court of Appeals (People v Rosen, 96 NY2d 329 [2001] and People v Daniels, 5 NY3d 738 [2005]), and at the Second Circuit (Brown v Greiner, 409 F3d 523 (2d Cir 2003]). [read post]