Search for: "Watkins v. Watkins"
Results 721 - 740
of 828
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2012, 5:45 pm
Obamacare in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 6:17 am
McNeily, Latham & Watkins LLP, on Thursday, July 11, 2019 Tags: Fiduciary duties, Investment Advisers Act, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation, U.S. federal courts [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 5:54 am
Cohen, Latham & Watkins LLP, on Sunday, February 5, 2017 Tags: Accounting, Disclosure, Earnings disclosure, Exchange Act, Filings, Financial reporting, IPOs, JOBS Act, Registration statements, Regulation S-K, SEC, Securities Act, Securities regulation, Small firms 2016 Developments in Securities and M&A Litigation Posted by Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Monday, February 6, 2017 Tags: Appraisal rights, Class actions, Delaware cases, Disclosure, Erica John Fund… [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
The SLB also touches on the Rule 14a-8(i)(7) litigation playing out in Trinity Wall Street v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 7:07 pm
Watkins v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 7:19 pm
" Yesterday's FinCri Advisor featured a jeremiad in which some experts warned that the Cuomo v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 6:47 am
The employee’s retaliation claim also advanced based on evidence that she was fired within four months of her EEOC charge, under circumstances that were unusual with respect to the employer’s disciplinary process (Watkins v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
Supreme Court, reinstated the entire $75.9 million punitive damages award that the Court had overturned nearly one year earlier in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 7:07 pm
Watkins v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:14 am
Watkins v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 6:27 am
Loseman, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Saturday, July 30, 2016 Tags: Class actions, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fraud-on-the-Market, Halliburton, Merger litigation,Omnicare v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:51 am
However, where disqualification is not required under objective standards, a judge ‘is the sole arbiter of recusal’ (People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403, 405 [1987]). [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
In 2009, I wrote about Watkins v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 4:09 pm
Watkins, 335 U.S. 160. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 1:09 pm
Bell of Latham & Watkins in Washington — argued that Iqbal did not change the law, and did not aler the Twombly rule on plausibility requirements. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
In 2009, I wrote about Watkins v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm
., v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm
., v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
In City of Dallas v. [read post]
