Search for: "Wells v. Social Security Administration"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,692
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2010, 9:56 am
Lebous [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports]The general guideline followed by court is considering an appeal from an administrative decision is that the court must confirm an administrative decision if there exists a rational basis for the determination, applying the standard set by the Court of Appeals in Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
On this point it is well to remember that regardless of what an appointing authority believes to be the case, or intended in appointing the individual to, or continuing the individual in, the position, the status of the individual as recorded in the personnel records of the responsible civil service department or commission control. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
On this point it is well to remember that regardless of what an appointing authority believes to be the case, or intended in appointing the individual to, or continuing the individual in, the position, the status of the individual as recorded in the personnel records of the responsible civil service department or commission control. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 6:16 am
These examples have fueled discussions related to accountability and “what to do” with those responsible for violations, on the role of the UN Security Council, the International Criminal Court, and other mechanisms such as the various UN Commissions of Inquiry and Panels of Experts. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
Mitchell Roob, Jr., Jeff Wells, a 7-page opinion, Judge May writes:A class composed of persons who applied for Medicaid, were denied, and appealed the denial brought an action against the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration ("FSSA"). [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
We discuss who automatically qualifies for separation and who might face the choice of separation or masking as well as articulating the harms of such a regime on them. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:22 am
They offered no evidence that Congress enacted Section 1983 in 1871 with contract cases in mind; showed no well-settled background principles had been incorporated into the statute; and ignored amendments to the Social Security Act (another spending clause law) endorsing some private enforcement under the court’s established approach. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 5:07 am
Aleksandr V. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 10:04 am
She said that J.G. received a monthly Social Security payment of $710, qualified for Medicaid, and was the beneficiary of an irrevocable special-needs trust that carried a balance of $19,000.2 She attributed well over $2,000 in monthly expenses to J.G. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm
Laws passed by Congress as well as orders from the U.S. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 6:30 am
Yesterday in Astrue v. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
TITLE IIDEPARTMENT OF LABOREmployment And Training Administrationprogram administrationFor an additional amount for “Program Administration”, $5,000,000, t [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 11:51 pm
BarreraIn Aramark Facility Services v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:30 am
Are Facebook, YouTube and other social media companies enablers for cybercriminals? [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 2:51 pm
Illiberal constraints on privacy and expression do not bode well for discouraging an illiberal political and social agenda. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
In Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
By the end of the Obama Administration, and with its TPP model, coming at the same time as China began developing its own Marxist-Leninist version of the structuring of a global economic system, the writing was on the wall. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
--To facilitate implementation of this section, the Secretary of Agriculture may approve waivers of the limits on certification periods otherwise applicable under section 3(f) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2012(f)), reporting requirements otherwise applicable under section 6(c) of such Act (7 U.S.C. 2015(c)), and other administrative requirements otherwise applicable to State agencies under such Act. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 6:57 am
Indeed, Roberts relied heavily on Justice Robert Jackson’s concurring opinion in Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 10:45 am
Supreme Court made clear in Riley v. [read post]
