Search for: "Witte v. WITTE" Results 721 - 740 of 800
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2018, 6:00 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
” To “defraud the United States” has a specific meaning under U.S. case law: According to Hammerschmidt v. [read post]
The Constitution requires the president both to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed” and—as Benjamin Wittes and Quinta Jurecic have noted—to swear by oath that he will “faithfully execute” the demands of his or her office. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 12:23 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Ben Sasse spoke for a number of the bill’s critics when he voiced concern that this provision would be unconstitutional as a matter of separation of powers: “Many of us think we are bound” by Justice Antonin Scalia’s lone dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Jane Chong
As Benjamin Wittes recently wrote on the subject, “good faith matters. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 6:43 am by Adam J. White
’s commitment to the Paris Accord is precisely the sort of “reliance interest” which, under the Supreme Court’s explanation in FCC v. [read post]
” Sedition is a serious charge, but a number of analysts (including Lawfare’s Benjamin Wittes) have raised the possibility that certain conduct related to yesterday’s debacle might meet the terms of the statute. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 11:37 am by Rishabh Bhandari, David Hopen
The Kremlin has denied accusations that it hacked the Democratic National Committee’s emails in order to interfere with the U.S. presidential election in favor of Republican nominee Donald Trump, dismissing the allegations as “an old trick” and a “maniacal attemp[t] to exploit the Russian theme in the U.S. election campaign. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
On 10 May 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard applications in the cases of Ghuman v Ghuman and Hussain v Feeney. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:53 am by Sarah Grant
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in Force v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 8:19 am by Marco D'Ostuni
In particular, to maintain a fair proportion with 5G spectrum auction prices, license renewal fees should reflect the specific features of the WiMax license renewals, in terms of: (i) actual band quantity; (ii) smaller geographic coverage; (iii) shorter duration; (iv) differences in market potential; and (v) absence of further renewal rights. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 9:45 pm by Andrew Hudson
A series of cases sought to clarify the defence in s123, for the benefit of brand owners, the most definitive of which was Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Limited [2012] FCAFC 130. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:44 am by Dáire McCormack-George
In other words, assume countries A and B have concluded a PTA in accordance with Article V GATS. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:44 am by Maria Kendrick
In other words, assume countries A and B have concluded a PTA in accordance with Article V GATS. [read post]
The EU Commission’s rejection of the Hairdressers’ Agreement as well as the decision in European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU) and Jan Willem Goudriaan v European Commission, Case T–310/18, 24 October 2019 come to mind. [read post]