Search for: "Word v. Jones"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,720
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
Jones.* Down the Tubes: H&M Breached Settlement Agreement by Infringing PatentJani analyses Stretchline Intellectual Properties Ltd v H&M Hennes & Mauritz UK Ltd [2015] EWHC 3298 (Pat), a decision that dealt with a UK patent concerning the tubular fabric in underwired garments such as brassieres.* Goodbye, good luck! [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 5:12 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:57 am
That this is the case is demonstrated by Katfriend and occasional contributor Dorothea Thompson, in this guest piece below:The Court of Appeal (Lady Justice Arden, Lords Justices Kitchin and Lloyd Jones) has confirmed that a definition’s express wording cannot be displaced by language elsewhere in the contract. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 11:18 am
(Taylor Jones/Ft. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
See Mein v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:45 am
In other words, a Rule 12(b)(6) motion does not argue that a lawsuit is defective because there is some deficiency or other problem with the facts in the case. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 2:35 pm
Jones, 210 Va. 519, 522 (1970). [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 11:36 am
Jones, 210 Va. 519, 522 (1970). [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 11:36 am
Jones, 210 Va. 519, 522 (1970). [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:23 am
That decision, E.C. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 11:41 am
The cases are Jones v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 11:25 am
In the recent decision of E.C. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am
Riley, 14-1472, and Jones v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
Although the Court hasn’t said so in as many words, it is widely understood that the Court relists cases that it has tentatively decided to grant certiorari to review, and uses the extra time to perform a check for vehicle problems that might keep the Court from resolving the question presented. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 5:25 am
Estate of Howell v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 5:25 am
Estate of Howell v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:41 am
Hewitt, doesn't this [questioning the effectiveness of the Church's enactment of the Dennis Canon] call into question the teaching of Jones v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 7:09 am
(How they succeeded in pulling off that strategy will be the subject of my following post.)For ECUSA and its attorneys, the world of church property law began and ended with Watson v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Because a majority of the Texas Supreme Court has the last word on the matter every time the issue comes up. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Because a majority of the Texas Supreme Court has the last word on the matter every time the issue comes up. [read post]
