Search for: "Wyeth Pharmaceuticals"
Results 721 - 740
of 971
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2009, 1:54 pm
Supreme Court ruled against the drugmaker Wyeth holding that pharmaceutical companies can be held liable for harm from medicines that carry warnings approved by federal regulators. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 1:01 pm
Wyeth lawsuit. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:55 pm
As previously blogged about, Diana Levine lost her arm due to complications after being given the anti-nausea medication Phenergan, manufactured by pharmaceutical giant, Wyeth, incorrectly. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 11:50 am
But Alito, Steven, and Scalia are clearly acting in the service of the interests that would get rid of state tort suits — in this case, the pharmaceutical industry. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 11:06 am
The drug company, Wyeth Pharmaceutical, had asked the justices to throw out the award on the basis of federal preemption. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:14 am
The six Justices who joined in upholding a verdict of nearly $6.8 million against the pharmacetical company Wyeth have sent their own warnings: to the industry, and to the Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 9:15 am
The justices, voting 6-3, said that pharmaceutical companies aren't shielded from suit by the Food and Drug Administration's approval of a treatment and its packaging information. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:17 am
The Court, in Wyeth v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:39 am
Wyeth) and at the same time took a step in the right direction for making pharmaceutical drugs safer for all. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:38 am
In a 6-3 decision Wednesday, the court rejected Wyeth Pharmaceuticals’ claim that federal approval of its Phenergan anti-nausea drug should have shielded the company from state lawsuits like the one filed by Diana Levine of Vermont. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:08 am
The complexity of the pharmaceutical industry is one big, woven, tangled web to think about. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:04 am
She won a $700,000 malpractice settlement against the clinic, but then sued Wyeth in state court, arguing that the pharmaceutical firm should have revised its FDA-approved label to bar IV-push injections. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
Wyeth, Inc., 2006 WL 462470 (N.J. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 4:35 am
Wyeth. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 6:51 am
Last week we encountered arguments from the other side that any justice (at least any justice that might be defense oriented) owning any stock in any pharmaceutical company ought to recuse him/herself from Wyeth v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(PharmaLittle) US: PerkinElmer sues Interna to invalidate down syndrome test patent (Law360) US: Monsanto files patent suit against Michigan farmers Earl and Richard Schroeder accusing them of planting pesticide-resistant seeds without paying proper royalties (Law360) US: Case to watch: preclusive effect of prior claim construction: Shire v Sandoz (Patently-O) Products AndroGel (Testosterone) - US: Federal Trade Commission continues campaign against reverse payments, filing complaint… [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:49 pm
No, says Doug Petkus, a Wyeth Pharmaceuticals spokesman. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 10:58 am
But perhaps the most compelling story is of course Diana Levine, whose case Wyeth v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(IP finance) Pharmaceutical Technology article on barriers to entry for generic pharma companies based in emerging economies (Afro-IP) The effects of IP protection on agricultural research: Patents are not the problem – response to Nature Biotechnology article ‘Patents Versus Patenting: Implications of Intellectual Property Protection for Biological Research’ (Patent Docs) SPC seminar – a brief report (The SPC Blog) (The SPC Blog) Ruminations on the… [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 12:19 pm
Astrazenaca Pharmaceuticals, LP, 223 F.R.D. 659, 664 (M.D. [read post]
