Search for: "AGENCY, LLC"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 8,954
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2022, 11:55 am
On February 28, 2022, the California Public Utilities Commission (“CPUC”) issued its first “Drivered Deployment” permits to Cruise LLC and Waymo LLC, allowing for passenger service in CAVs with a safety driver present. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 7:15 am
GotNews, LLC, 2019 U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 7:24 am
GSP sought a loan from [OPIC], a [U.S.] agency that provides financing . . . to encourage participation in foreign business projects. . . . [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 6:11 am
Also targeted are employee rights to use employer’s email (Purple Communications), the expansion of Weingarten protections, and employee conduct (typically racist) that the Board has found protected while other agencies, notably the EEOC, would not. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 7:15 am
Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, 138 S. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
If so … (Class 46) Poland Reputation’s rating (Class 46) Polish patent attorneys’ professionalism (Class 46) South Africa Orange miniskirt debacle less filling (Patent Baristas) (Class 46) Spain Supreme Court rules on marks consisting of colours ‘per se’ (Class 46) Tunisia Tunisia lines up for copyright training (Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC: KCI negative pressure patent valid and infringed: KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith & Nephew plc… [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm
Sony Music Entertainement – 42West, LLC, Paradigm Talent Agency, LLC, Epic Records, Inc., Bill Young Productions, Inc. and Sara Bareilles (Filed: August 19, 2014 as 1:2014cv06659) 05) Hayuk v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 9:00 am
Department of Health and Human Services (US DHHS) and the Office of Inspector General (OIG) won’t enforce the Anti-Kickback Statute if medical providers and chiropractors engage in activity these federal agencies have said is OK to do. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:40 pm
In Rafaeli, LLC v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(Class 46) Poland Reputation's rating (Class 46) Polish patent attorneys’ professionalism (Class 46) South Africa Orange miniskirt debacle less filling (Patent Baristas) (Class 46) Spain Supreme Court rules on marks consisting of colours ‘per se’ (Class 46) Tunisia Tunisia lines up for copyright training (Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC: KCI negative pressure patent valid and infringed: KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith & Nephew… [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:26 pm
Although no federal agency has ever exercised its march-in power—at least theoretically—the option exists. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am
(Docket Report) ITC issues limited exclusion order and cease & desist order against Emcore in optoelectronic devices investigation (ITC 337 Update) (ITC Law Blog) ITC issues final determination of no violation in Certain Encapsulated Integrated Circuit Devices (337-TA-501) brought by Amkor (ITC Law Blog) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps ACQIS – Inequitable conduct defense dismissed, with leave to replead consistent with Exergen: ACQIS LLC v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:52 pm
TMX Intermodal Logistics LLC, No. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 2:34 pm
Since the defendant conducted essentially the same business, it was liable as a successor (Blachana, LLC dba Penner’s Portsmouth Club v Bureau of Labor and Industries). [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:18 pm
Galardi Group Franchise & Leasing, LLC, v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
("GSS") (D.I. 12); the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency d/b/a American Education Services ("PHEAA") (D.I. 20); Wilmington Trust Company ("WTC") (D.I. 31); U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm
Rooming House Act did not apply to Assisted Living Facility here ESTATE OF JAMES BURNS, by and through BRIAN BURNS, EXECUTOR,v CARE ONE AT STANWICK, LLC d/b/a CARE ONE HARMONY VILLAGE AT MOORESTOWN and CARE ONE, LLC,SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISIONDOCKET NO. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 4:42 am
Mountain View Lawn Care, LLC). [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 2:18 pm
CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, 59 Cal.4th 348 (2014), the California Supreme Court held that any waiver of an employee’s right to pursue PAGA claims, either at all or in court, violates California public policy and is unenforceable under California law. [read post]
