Search for: "Battle v. State"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 8,263
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2009, 10:45 pm
Teenie Weenie Wins Split Decision Over Paddington in TTAB 2(d) Battle-of-the-Bear-DesignsDivided TTAB Panel Disagrees over Doctrine of Equivalents, Reverses 2(d) Refusal of "ALLEZ FILLES! [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 1:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 6:29 am
Madison and Brown v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 8:26 pm
Although decided over two decades apart, United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 7:58 am
Those waiting for a decision in the hotly-anticipated Ricci v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Chiropractic Neurodiagnostic, P.C. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 3:55 am
Last week in State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Harris v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 2:23 pm
It was found unconstitutional for this one man, not the entire state. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 11:55 am
Commissioner Rosch v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:53 pm
State of New Mexico v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 3:17 pm
The matter, Rockland County v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 5:39 am
One was a New York state decision; the other was the landmark Dean v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 3:34 am
Texas Monthly named state Rep. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 3:22 am
Roness v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 11:37 am
Ideology v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 4:30 am
Second, citing the Delaware Chancery Court's 2008 decision in Seneca Investments LLC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
