Search for: "C & S Company, Inc." Results 7381 - 7400 of 7,902
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
  The Board also observed that the company consistently maintained that it is not bound to any collective-bargaining agreements with the Union. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 4:45 am
7-15-2008 National:One of the best places on the Internet to find information about a company -- such as a litigation adversary -- is the company's own Web site. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 6:05 am
"The final deal-breaker in S.1145 was apportionment of damages.The text at pocketpcthoughts had come from Tim Conneally of BetaNews, which also noted the case was in ED Texas ANDTyphoon alleged that Dell and Motion Computing Inc. were "using and profiting from" the company's patented technologies. [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 4:25 pm
  One example of pretexting would be using a false identity while phoning a bank to elicit a bank customer's personal account information. [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 6:36 am
Should customers not use a leading product because the company has what may be a minor legal problem? [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
: (Spicy IP), India: Ranbaxy-Daiichi deal – Opportunities for private equity companies in India: (Profitability through Simplicity), India: (KEI) Cracking open anti-competitive practices in the developing world: complaints, amendments and waivers: (Spicy IP), India: Is it one rule for Indian pharma companies and another one for those from abroad? [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 6:46 pm by John Wood
  As the Court held, “Even if Sgro did ask MetLife for the records, that company can’t be liable under section 1132(c)(1). [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 9:59 am
Since the trade mark, the claimant and the legal issues were the same as in the earlier case, the two were consolidated.Reviewing its own earlier Advisory Opinion in Case E-2/97 Mag Instrument Inc. v California Trading Company Norway [1997] EFTA Ct. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:30 am
" In the meanwhile, after Tal's first dissolution case was marked off calendar in 2004, Plotkin set up a new company with his wife as 100% shareholder called Superior Vending Services, Inc. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 10:59 am
 Wyeth’s motion asserted that the court lacked “territorial competence” over the U.S. entities of the company pursuant to the Court Jurisdiction and Proceedings Transfer Act, S.B.C. 2003, c. 28 (the “CJPTA”). [read post]