Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 33,829
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2019, 11:51 am
In Jessica Ferra v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 7:21 am
In AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:09 am
”[10] The Preemption Directive most directly affected California, which had passed its own net neutrality law, the most comprehensive in the country.[11] Mozilla v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 1:51 pm
The new law codifies the “ABC” test for determining independent contractor status, which was adopted as the default classification test by the California Supreme Court in its 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 1:09 pm
Show notes are located at www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/113 California Governor signs two controversial bills affecting entertainment and sportsBILLIONS LAWSUIT BEATEN BY SHOWTIME ORAL ARGUMENTS HELD in LED ZEPPELIN STAIRWAY TO HEAVEN CASEPARKER V. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 10:10 am
McDonald’s Corporation is welcome news for entities facing concerns about joint employment status under California law, and in particular, for franchisors. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm
Walters highlights Massachusetts v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 3:59 pm
After the California Second District Court of Appeal’s Oct. 8, 2019, decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 3:59 pm
After the California Second District Court of Appeal’s Oct. 8, 2019, decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:18 am
On Wednesday, October 9, 2019, the California Court of Appeal issued a long-awaited clarification of California’s meal and rest break penalty provision (Ferra v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:05 am
In City of Hesperia v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
Here’s what to look forward to in 2020: New Employee Classification Test: AB 5 codifies the “ABC” test adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:06 pm
AB 5 codifies the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 3:31 pm
LinkedIn argued that hiQ was in violation of LinkedIn’s user agreement as well as California law and federal law, including the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) and sent hiQ a cease-and-desist letter. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 9:22 am
But on September 26, 2019 in Naranjo v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
In Gonzales v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
In Gonzales v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Minnesota v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 4:39 pm
Hunton Privacy blog had a post on the California Governor Gavin Newsom, who announced that he signed all five of the California Legislature’s September 2019 amendments to the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”). [read post]
Case o' The Week: Ninth's Decision is Clear and Convincing -- Valle and Sentencing Standard of Proof
13 Oct 2019, 11:58 am
United States v. [read post]
