Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 7381 - 7400 of 16,708
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2021, 1:11 pm by John Lewis
” Specifically, the Petition for Rehearing En Banc, filed July 13, 2021, asserts that “upholding the Panel decision would needlessly create a circuit split on whether a class of workers must physically cross state lines to be ‘engaged in commerce’ under the FAA’s Section 1 . . . exemption,” citing Waithaka v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 1:11 pm by John Lewis
” Specifically, the Petition for Rehearing En Banc, filed July 13, 2021, asserts that “upholding the Panel decision would needlessly create a circuit split on whether a class of workers must physically cross state lines to be ‘engaged in commerce’ under the FAA’s Section 1 . . . exemption,” citing Waithaka v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 1:16 pm by farrah nagrampa
Circuit erred in invalidating an EPA rule that implemented limits on cross-state air pollution, and Schuette v. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 6:12 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
A member of the highway patrol stated that the Chevrolet Trailblazer was heading East on Highway 387 when it went left of center and struck the Honda CR-V head-on. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 1:28 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Crawford v Washington and People v Brown held that the Confrontation Clause bars the admission of testimonial out-of-court statements made by a witness who is not subject to cross-examination. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm by Howard Gutman
” On cross-examination, Clayton stated that “brakes were working normal when I road tested it. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:54 am by Jeremy Saland
What is the legal standard that must be crossed for a threat to rise to the level of a valid arrest and prosecution? [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:14 pm by Cannabis Law Group
The lawsuit was filed by 24 cities and Santa Cruz County, all of them contending that the state regulatory agency crossed the boundaries of its authority when it made the rule pertaining to marijuana deliveries. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
Civil Rights Law section 65 was amended to provide that any person may elect to resume the use of a former middle name upon divorce or annulment and that the state shall not impose a fee to change the middle name on a state identifying document due to a change in marital status. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 6:06 am
On Huffington Post, Jay Wexler discusses the upcoming case Salazar v. [read post]