Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 7381 - 7400 of 8,963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2010, 8:45 am by Steve Roosa
" The second is to ask: what is the relevant social or policy goal from a normative standpoint (say, technological progress) and does the court decision advance that goal? [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 10:02 pm
In providing this response, Defendants do not vouch for the veracity, accuracy, or validity of the information contained within the online resource www.wikipedia.org. ; Neither do Defendants claim the response as their own, but have merely provided the information to respond to this Interrogatory to the best of their ability based on diligent research and investigation: Setup 1. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
Judge Castle observed that the securities complaint does not allege that Lewis or any other defendant "stood to gain from non-disclosure" and to not allege "a quid pro quo type arrangement" or that failing to disclose the federal funding brought a benefit to any defendant. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 2:02 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 86027, July 1, 2010), and permitted a Jewish inmate who objected to the manner in which his kosher food was being prepared to proceed with a claim for injunctive relief against defendants in their official capacities. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:58 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The SG’s brief does not frontally attack the Second Circuit’s reasoning. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:33 am by David Lat
A firm committee, including at least one attorney not involved in the litigation and inside general counsel, will review any 1:4-8 letter received. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 6:33 am
The motion to suppress the stop of defendant’s tractor trailer is granted because the court does not believe the officer. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 7:56 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
That notice disclosed that an exchange of subordinated debt for preferred shares had occurred, along with a 1-for-20 reverse stock split. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 6:04 am by Adam Wagner
The maximum sentence for a section 20 offence is 5 years imprisonment for an individual charge, although this could be increased if a defendant has infected more than one person. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 5:32 am
  Krano [Profile] Member Aug. 20, 2010 1:09pm CST Krano   Check out the lawyer that these people hired. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Thus, going forward with the appeal does not seem like a worthwhile gamble for Flexiteek. [read post]