Search for: "English v. English"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 11,204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
(A123) v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:16 pm
Through these cases the High Court elected not to follow the English approach (see Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex Ltd) which requires that another forum is clearly or distinctly more appropriate. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 5:12 pm
” He relied on the English Court of Appeal decision in Adams v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:37 am
C.A.); Newby v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 3:42 am
Next week, we are concluding our Webinar Series in French and English. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
Kelley v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 4:01 am
Referring to the decisions of the English courts in Payton v Snelling, Lampard and Pasquali Cigarette Co. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 7:39 am
State v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm
MXB v East Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust [2012] EWHC 3279 (QB) - Mr Justice Tugendhat updates his own guidance on child anonymity orders in social media age. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 1:10 am
On 14 September, Thawley J refused that application: Australian Information Commissioner v Facebook Inc (No 2) [2020] FCA 1307. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
In AMP v Persons Unknown [2011] EWHC 3454 (TCC) (20 December 2011), in the Technology and Construction court, an applicant successfully invoked her right to privacy under Article 8, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, and was granted an interim injunction to prevent transmission, storage and indexing of any part or parts of certain photographic images taken from the phone, and an anonymity order under CPR r.39.2(4), as explained by Rosalind English here. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:06 pm
(on the application of Brighton & Hove City Council) v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 2:39 am
Liquidated Damages v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:51 am
See McCormick v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 11:42 am
In Edwards v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:05 am
This very issue arose in R v Fraser (Fraser). [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:11 am
Waterkotte: Provisional injunctions under unfair competition law The Higher Regional Court of Hamburg addressed the delimitation between Art. 7(1) and (2) of the Brussels Ibis Regulation after Wikingerhof v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 5:34 am
The Court concludes, it is submitted correctly, that the subject matter of the English proceedings falls outside the scope of the Brussels I Regulation (para 23) whereas the (principal) subject matter of the Italian proceedings falls within scope (para 26). [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
Though it lacks an exact English counterpart, it has often been translated “harmony. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 3:14 pm
The officer and the driver conversed in English. [read post]
