Search for: "HOPE v. STATE"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 16,492
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2012, 8:07 am
District Court Judge Keith Ellison denied Will’s pleas for a new trial but wrote that he lamented doing so because of “disturbing uncertainties” raised about his guilt.Will is hoping the court’s ruling in Martinez will allow him to argue that he should get a new trial because both his trial lawyer and his state-appointed habeas lawyer were ineffective when they failed to track down several witnesses who have testified that the other man confessed to… [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 3:41 am
Stmt of Allegations - St. of Wash. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:32 am
Kaplan successfully argued for Edie Windsor in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
And in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 10:26 am
I did not know much about the United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 8:10 pm
Kortum v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm
Graham Co. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:42 am
" Iqbal v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 2:22 am
Such a scenario would be at odds with the stated aim of the UK government to make “the UK a global centre for the development, commercialisation and adoption of responsible AI”, in the hope of “securing the UK’s position among the global AI superpowers. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
And with hopes that my fourth colleague will have a full recovery.Gochman writes about the human side of life as an appellate lawyer, especially her twenty-minute argument before the Supreme Court in Apprendi v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 7:10 am
The case is Arizona v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:42 pm
I hope the answer is no. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:50 pm
Though Life Technologies v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 2:17 am
The two are suing MPEG LA--a patent pool administrator in good standing that has been around for more than a quarter century (Wikipedia article)--in the Supreme Court of the State of New York (County of New York, case no. 653232/2022, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) and SK Telecom Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:57 pm
Decker v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 10:46 am
Earlier this year, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:02 am
"); R.A.V. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
No. 8-13-08129-las.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:00 am
One of them, courtesy of the Detroit Business Law Blog, is an unpublished ruling by a Michigan intermediate appellate court last year in Schimke v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm
Noting that this was found to be compatible with Art 8 in Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8, Sir Alan Ward also notes that in Yordanova v Bulgaria (Application No. 25446/06, dated 24th April 2012) [our note] the ECtHR said: “However, Article 8 does not impose on Contracting States an obligation to tolerate unlawful land occupation indefinitely…”.Therefore:I conclude that the court must approach the claim made by a private landowner… [read post]
