Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2015, 6:35 am
The recent case of Towe v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:40 am
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., an Ohio federal court relied on the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Clapper v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
Regards, Roy] Walmart v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:18 am
The dissent cited to United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 6:00 am
In Santamaria v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:02 pm
One of the most dearly held rights Americans have is stated in the First Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 3:43 pm
The Minnesota Supreme Court is currently considering this argument in a case called State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 4:20 am
In Harris v Barbera 2018 NY Slip Op 05023 Decided on July 5, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department (without much explanation) held that while the complaint stated a cause of action for failing to illuminate marital dissipation, the proofs were not. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:37 am
As Matthew Scarola at SCOTUSBlog put it, "Today’s opinion in McDonald v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 9:01 pm
In the 1964 case of Bouie v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 7:30 pm
The 11th Circuit previously explained in the case of United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 2:43 pm
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court hears argument in Bowman v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm
Both held that 42 USC § 1396a(a)(23) allows Medicaid recipients to challenge a state’s designation of who or what is a qualified Medicaid provider. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 7:57 am
Supreme Court will hear oral argument in State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 8:53 am
The Supreme Court held that was to be considered a forfeiture clause if you apply the test established in Clays Lane Housing Co-operative Ltd v Patrick [1985] 17 HLR 188, and the lower courts had been wrong to conclude otherwise. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:42 pm
Smith v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:12 am
The Fourth relied on United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2004, 3:15 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
The issue of whether an employee has suffered a requisite “adverse employment action” under our state’s whistleblower law when transferred out of his longstanding job into another after he blows the whistle on his employer’s violations of law or public policy, was recently addressed by the New Jersey Appellate Division in Jeffrey Scozzafava v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
The issue of whether an employee has suffered a requisite “adverse employment action” under our state’s whistleblower law when transferred out of his longstanding job into another after he blows the whistle on his employer’s violations of law or public policy, was recently addressed by the New Jersey Appellate Division in Jeffrey Scozzafava v. [read post]
