Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 9,823
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am
Samsonite Europe (EPLAW) New Zealand Designs amendment regulations now promulgated (Class 99) Poland Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw rules that the mark 60 R-156991 is not sufficiently distinctive in standard business transactions (Class 46) L’OREAL not confusingly similar to O’LEARY? [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:30 am
Arizona, we're simultaneously seeing this administration insist that state court juries should exercise dominion over interstate commerce already fully regulated by the federal government. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 3:14 am
[See, for example, In re Wm. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 2:27 am
In re Imax Securities Litigation, 2011 WL 1487090. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:18 am
Okay, so I’m back from vacation and trying to stay abreast of what’s going on with the Kramer & Kaslow mass joinder lawsuits, which are being tried by attorney Phillip Kramer whom I interviewed in late February after I received copies of mailings from homeowners soliciting participation in a lawsuit settlement that I found deceptive or misleading. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 5:00 am
” Doing good is not a judge’s job, as he has said. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 4:49 am
Dinwoodie: suggests you’re still reluctant to impose prescriptive judgments about what should matter to consumers. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 12:10 pm
Utilizing one of the procedures that has earned Philadelphia that reputation, the court ordered consolidated trials right off the bat, with the “first eight actions” to be tried together and Branham’s case designated “lead. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:20 am
STONG, Bankruptcy Judge. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 3:36 am
The 8th affirmed the judge’s exclusion of the testimony because the defense hadn’t provided an expert report. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm
May 14, 2007), an Alabama state court judge reached the same conclusion in a metoclopramide/Reglan case:The majority of courts that have considered the issues presented in this case have found that only the manufacturer of the generic drug which was sold are liable. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:15 pm
It's not that Judge Wolf (sitting by designation from Massachusetts) gets this one wrong. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 7:04 am
But, the TWC judge ruled against her on that one issue. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
Many interesting articles in March on arbitration. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am
A three-judge panel of the Federal Circuit affirmed. 598 F.3d 831 (Fed. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am
A three-judge panel of the Federal Circuit affirmed. 598 F.3d 831 (Fed. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:11 am
Drawing upon a rule articulated in dicta by Judge Rich in In re Handel, 312 F.2d 943, 946 n.2 (CCPA 1963), an implication of the rule in In re Muller, 417 F.2d 1387 (CCPA 1969), and an assumption of the rule in Hewlett-Packard Co. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:47 am
Thanks Judge. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:23 pm
Judge Scalia confronted Microsoft with its Janus-like position: Well, you can't keep shifting horses, now. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm
(TTABlog) TTAB precedential no. 9: Finding wine and beer related, TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of HB over HB & Crown Design: In re Kysela Pere et Fils, Ltd. [read post]
