Search for: "Lee v. Lee"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 7,968
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
30 May 2008, 6:19 am
Yesterday's oral arguments before the Supreme Court in the direct appeal case of Roy Lee Ward v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 9:21 am
In the McIntosh v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 1:04 am
Co. v. [read post]
26 May 2008, 5:20 am
Nelson, Indianapolis, IN. 9:45 AM - Roy Lee Ward v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 1:04 pm
Lee v Rhondda Cynon Taff County Borough Council [2008] EWCA Civ 523 concerns whether a Local Authority should have considered the acquisition of a plot for a caravan in the context of a review of an offer of ’suitable’ accommodation following assumption of housing duty to a homeless Romany Gypsy. [read post]
21 May 2008, 9:32 am
Supreme Court reaffirmed the rule in the Quill v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 9:32 am
Supreme Court reaffirmed the rule in the Quill v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 9:03 am
So this Anita Lee story will have to suffice for today. [read post]
20 May 2008, 12:50 pm
el empleo de la vÃÂa penal debe corresponder a la necesidad de tutelar bienes jurÃÂdicos fundamentales frente a conductas que impliquen graves lesiones a dichos bienes, y guarden relación con la magnitud del daño inferido. [read post]
18 May 2008, 8:26 am
The Supreme Court reversal May 13th in the case of Andrew Lee Watts v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 11:02 pm
Next, after exploring how the Supreme Court's lesson about the importance of the PHOSITA in KSR v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:30 pm
Oral Argument in case: 07-3651; Lee, Flynt J. v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 9:37 am
And Chief Judge Haworth can hardly be blamed for relying on the court’s inherent powers, since he was only following the lead set by the Florida Supreme Court in Makemson v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:57 am
Aktiebolag v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:12 am
All I have time for today is this link to a recent Anita Lee story in the Sun Herald (thanks to Ted Frank of Overlawyered and Point of Law for the heads up) about the Renfroe v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 2:41 pm
But I would not close the courthouse door to an insurance company that is willing and able to do so.In Andrew Lee Watts v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 8:17 am
As in McIntosh v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 5:17 pm
The plaintiff met its initial burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the insurance policy exclusions did not clearly and unambiguously apply to the loss in this case (see Lee v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
12 May 2008, 3:51 pm
Hoffman (post below) falls to #3.In Prince Seating Corp. v. [read post]
